MOBILE Archives

March 2007

MOBILE@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Francis Swasey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussions about Treo smart phones <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:19:52 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2404 bytes) , smime.p7s (3293 bytes)
No, that is not how I read that posting... 2.5 did not support the palm 
location field and so OCS put it in the title field.

Frank

On 3/6/07 10:41 AM, Geoffrey Duke wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> I didnít try the 2.5x client on my 650. But I gathered from the FAQ link 
> I posted and this forum post
> 
>  
> 
> http://forum.synthesis.ch/showthread.php?t=200&highlight=Location+title 
> <http://forum.synthesis.ch/showthread.php?t=200&highlight=Location+title>
> 
>  
> 
> that it /should/ put the location info in the correct field when using 
> the earlier client version. They donít discuss versions of Oracle 
> Calendar Server, though. That may have an impact. Are other palm-based 
> Treo users seeing the location data populated correctly on your palm 
> calendar (that is, not as a part of the event title)?
> 
>  
> 
> --Geoff
> 
>  
> 
> PS> CC-ing the treo listserv.
> 
>  
> 
> *From:* Technology Discussion at UVM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> *On Behalf Of *David Todd
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2007 10:06 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: Oracle Calendar and SyncML
> 
>  
> 
> OK, in reading back through this thread, it looks like the 
> location-in-title issue is likely to be there no matter which version of 
> SyncML we're using.  Right?
> 
> Francis Swasey wrote:
> 
> The new features (specifically the resume an interrupted sync) requires 
> a SyncML Server V2.  The Oracle Calendar Server provides a SyncML Server 
> V1 -- so, we're not there yet.  And Version 10 of the Calendar Server is 
> still using V1 of the SyncML server (to the best of my knowledge) -- so, 
> we won't get their new gee-whiz features there either.
> 
> The admonition on their web site to stay with client version 2.5 is 
> specifically directed at Calendar Version 10 installs.  Our current 
> Calendar Version 9 install has no such specific SyncML version matching. 
>  It has configs for synthesis_palm_std and synthesis_palm_pro.  So, no 
> need to fear v3.0 (SyncML) until we migrate to V10 (Calendar) -- but no 
> new feature gains either. :(
> 
> Frank
> 
>  
> 

-- 
Frank Swasey                    | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs
Sr Systems Administrator        | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
University of Vermont           |    just like everyone else.
   "I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)



ATOM RSS1 RSS2