MOBILE Archives

March 2007

MOBILE@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Francis Swasey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussions about Treo smart phones <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:19:52 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2404 bytes) , smime.p7s (3293 bytes)
No, that is not how I read that posting... 2.5 did not support the palm 
location field and so OCS put it in the title field.

Frank

On 3/6/07 10:41 AM, Geoffrey Duke wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I didnít try the 2.5x client on my 650. But I gathered from the FAQ link
> I posted and this forum post
>
>
>
> http://forum.synthesis.ch/showthread.php?t=200&highlight=Location+title
> <http://forum.synthesis.ch/showthread.php?t=200&highlight=Location+title>
>
>
>
> that it /should/ put the location info in the correct field when using
> the earlier client version. They donít discuss versions of Oracle
> Calendar Server, though. That may have an impact. Are other palm-based
> Treo users seeing the location data populated correctly on your palm
> calendar (that is, not as a part of the event title)?
>
>
>
> --Geoff
>
>
>
> PS> CC-ing the treo listserv.
>
>
>
> *From:* Technology Discussion at UVM [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> *On Behalf Of *David Todd
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2007 10:06 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: Oracle Calendar and SyncML
>
>
>
> OK, in reading back through this thread, it looks like the
> location-in-title issue is likely to be there no matter which version of
> SyncML we're using. Right?
>
> Francis Swasey wrote:
>
> The new features (specifically the resume an interrupted sync) requires
> a SyncML Server V2. The Oracle Calendar Server provides a SyncML Server
> V1 -- so, we're not there yet. And Version 10 of the Calendar Server is
> still using V1 of the SyncML server (to the best of my knowledge) -- so,
> we won't get their new gee-whiz features there either.
>
> The admonition on their web site to stay with client version 2.5 is
> specifically directed at Calendar Version 10 installs. Our current
> Calendar Version 9 install has no such specific SyncML version matching.
> It has configs for synthesis_palm_std and synthesis_palm_pro. So, no
> need to fear v3.0 (SyncML) until we migrate to V10 (Calendar) -- but no
> new feature gains either. :(
>
> Frank
>
>
>

--
Frank Swasey | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs
Sr Systems Administrator | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
University of Vermont | just like everyone else.
   "I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)



ATOM RSS1 RSS2