LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for MUNINET Archives


MUNINET Archives

MUNINET Archives


MUNINET@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MUNINET Home

MUNINET Home

MUNINET  April 2007

MUNINET April 2007

Subject:

Re: Signatures on PTTR's

From:

dmarko <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:22:25 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (212 lines)

Perhaps we can have this discussion over the summer and try to come up with a specific proposal that makes sense. I will work with the clerk's association to find a good time. Deb Markowitz


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Annette Cappy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network<[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:33:41 -0400

>Signatures on PTTR'sI agree, Susie. This would be a good time to put some thoughts together to revamp a system that I think has been broken for years! Count me in!
>
>Annette Cappy
>Brattleboro
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Town of Wilmington
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 5:46 PM
> Subject: Signatures on PTTR's
>
>
> Dear Ann - I also do not sign the PTR acknowledgement, nor do I sign the Acknowledgement stamp that I affix to the deeds. I do not mind indicating the date a PTR came in on the stamp. I do not believe that it is my job to understand everything about certificates and Act 250 Disclosures in order to sign off that all was properly in place at the time of recording. I totally agree that the there should be a place filled in by the attorney/representative indicating what Tax ID number is being transferred. It is also not my job to be able to read a legal description to figure it out. I had this conversation with Charlie Merriman just prior to his leaving PVR, and think it would be a good discussion for some clerks and PVR and perhaps the Sec'y of State to engage in. The system sure needs improving - since it has come up, it seems like now is a good time to address it.
>
>
>
>
> Susie Haughwout
> Wilmington Town Clerk
> P.O. Box 217
> Wilmington, VT 05363
> 1-802-464-5836 Phone
> 1-802-464-1238 Fax
> [log in to unmask]
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ann Webster
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Signatures on PTTR's
>
>
> Deb, this sounds like a very good idea to have a letter that states exactly which boxes need to be completed in order for a PTR to be acceptable, but I have a concern that that may be interpreted that any box that is not included in the list may freely be left blank. Blank boxes sometimes create quite a bit of time for a clerk to identify exactly what property is being transferred. We also must deal with the fact that many times information is filled in that turns out to be incorrect, such as mailing address following closing, Box C Property Location, etc. Also, I do not sign the Town Clerk Acknowledgement at the bottom. I complete the information requested, but I do not sign as that seems to be acknowledging that I take responsibility for all required certificates and Act 250 paperwork having been filed. I don't know how I would know that if the section on the back of the form is incomplete. It would also make more sense to have the parcel ID number on the form rather than in the Town Clerk's section. The clerk should be able to verify that the parcel number appears to be correct rather than trying to identify the property in the first place. It should be made clear at this point if we can accept PTRs without SS# as they are more often left off now than a few years ago. I agree with Linda. Overall when documents are left with us for recording we are typically not allowed to pass judgment regarding the accuracy nor advised to give advice on what someone should do.
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Deborah Markowitz
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:01 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Signatures on PTTR's
>
>
>
> Hi all, The town clerks may only accept PTRs that are "complete and regular on their face." Over the years the tax department has "clarified" what this means. For example, at one time the department indicated that clerks needed to send back the documents when they did not include social security numbers. I have suggested to Susan that she write up a formal memo setting out the department's interpretation of this language so that clerks all know what is required and so that clerks can send a copy of the memo with the returned documents to the attorneys. I will also be happy to send the memo to the bar association so that they might e-mail it out to the bar as fair warning. Deb
>
>
>
> Deborah Markowitz
>
> Secretary of State
>
> 26 Terrace Street
>
> Montpelier, Vermont 05602
>
> 802-828-2148
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Linda L. Spence, CMC/CVC
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 12:09 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Signatures on PTTR's
>
> Perhaps, if Deb Markowitz is watching this conversation, she could "chime in" on this. I still maintain that is not the statutory duty of Town Clerks to monitor what the attorneys are or are not filling in on the PTRs. Linda
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Monte, Suzanne
>
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:54 AM
>
> Subject: Re: Signatures on PTTR's
>
>
>
> While all of the information requested on the PTR is useful and we encourage parties to fill in all the boxes and blanks, we recognize that refusing a PTR is an extreme and time-consuming measure not to be taken lightly.
>
> Sections 9606 and 9608 of Title 32 require a PTR to include the following: signatures of the parties or their legal representatives, the basis for any exemption claimed, the true value of the property transferred, such information as the commissioner may reasonably require for proper administration of the transfer tax, and certain information regarding local and state permits and Act 250 certificates.
>
> What does this means on the PTR itself for it to be considered "complete and regular on its face" as required by 32 V.S.A. §9607? The following sections must be completed: Sections A and B (including social security numbers); C; L or M through P; the section entitled "Local and State Permits and Act 250 Certificates"; and the parties must sign the form (signature of preparer is not required). If the property is enrolled in the current use program, Section K must also be filled in to comply with 32 V.S.A. §3757(e).
>
> Social security numbers are required for the administration of the transfer tax and must be included on the copy of the PTR filed with the Tax Department. SSNs should be blacked-out on the copy of the PTR filed in the land records.
>
> Suzanne
>
> Suzanne M. Monte
> Assistant Attorney General
> Vermont Department of Taxes,
> Division of Property Valuation and Review
> P.O. Box 429
> Montpelier, VT 05601-0429
> Phone: (802) 828-2731
> Fax: (802) 828-5873
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Thomas J. Dailey
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:00 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Signatures on PTTR's
>
> Suzanne - Does the signature requirement also apply to the preparer line? Some attorneys are reluctant to sign the returns they prepare - Tom
>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Monte, Suzanne
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 10:34 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Signatures on PTTR's
>
> Hi all,
>
> Town clerks cannot perform their statutory duties if a PTR is not signed.
>
> Section 9606(b) of Title 32 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated requires a PTR to be signed by each party. Section 9607 requires a PTR to be complete and regular on its face for a town clerk to issue a signed and written acknowledgment to the transferee and to affix an acknowledgment on the deed. If the PTR is not signed, it is not complete and the town clerk cannot issue an acknowledgment to the transferee or affix an acknowledgment on the deed.
>
> In addition, per 32 V.S.A. §9608 a town clerk cannot record a deed unless it is affixed with an acknowledgment of return and tax payment under Section 9607 and a signed certificate that the conveyance is in compliance with or exempt from the provisions of chapter 151 of Title 10. The required certificate is on page two of the PTR. Therefore, a town clerk cannot enter the required acknowledgment on a deed or record a deed until he/she receives a signed PTR.
>
> Suzanne M. Monte
> Assistant Attorney General
> Vermont Department of Taxes,
> Division of Property Valuation and Review
> P.O. Box 429
> Montpelier, VT 05601-0429
> Phone: (802) 828-2731
> Fax: (802) 828-5873
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Linda L. Spence, CMC/CVC
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 4:06 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Signatures on PTTR's
>
> Hi Toni,
>
>
>
> While I can understand your frustration at the lack of thoroughness of the PTTR's being completed by Attorneys etc., no where in state statute are we authorized to refuse anything for recording, barring the total absence of a PTTR or a survey mentioned in the deed.
>
>
>
> It would appear that your issue is with those preparing the PTTRs themselves, and not the Town Clerks.
>
>
>
> Linda
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: May, Toni
>
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 10:26 AM
>
> Subject: Signatures on PTTR's
>
>
>
>
>
> Many PTTR's are being submitted to the Tax Dept. without both sellers and buyers signatures.
> I would like to remind all town clerks that when a PTTR is filed, signatures by each of the parties or their legal representatives are required. 32 V.S.A 9606 (b).
>
> To avoid any confusion in the future, I ask that town clerks please double check PTTR's when they are submitted to their office. If they do not contain the required signatures, please send them back to the preparer to be filled out properly.
>
> I appreciate your time and cooperation in this matter.
>
> Thank You
> Toni May,Tax Examiner
> Vermont Property Transfer Tax
>
>
 
               

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager