LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCHOOL-IT Archives


SCHOOL-IT Archives

SCHOOL-IT Archives


SCHOOL-IT@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCHOOL-IT Home

SCHOOL-IT Home

SCHOOL-IT  April 2007

SCHOOL-IT April 2007

Subject:

Re: Ethereal (Network Sniffing Advice)

From:

Sam Hooker <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

School Information Technology Discussion <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:06:04 -0400

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (115 lines)

Bryan,

Wireshark is a great program for watching the conversations go by on your
network, and Bjorn and Dave have brought up some important points.

Dave said:
> It isn't any help on point to point connections on a switched network
> unless you are one of the points in the connection.

Since the "inline hub" won't provide you with much visibility into what's
happening between machines on a switched LAN (except for broadcast
traffic, as Dave points out), you'd need to follow Bjorn's suggestion to
get access to that traffic.

Bjorn said:
> Some managed switches have a port that is specifically for seeing all
> the data also.

If you have managed switches at the core of your network, this feature
can help substantially*. It's frequently called a "monitor port", or "port
mirroring". The idea is that you instruct the switch to copy ALL the data
being transferred across it to one special port, to which you connect your
sniffer. If your network is even moderately busy, the monitor port should
probably be a Gigabit port, if you have them available, and the sniffer
should be sporting a Gbit NIC and be a fairly robust machine. (Otherwise
both the switch and Wireshark will, I believe, drop packets in order to
keep up with the realtime data.)

* It won't be a silver bullet, though, if you have multiple switches
chained together, and the traffic you want to watch never transits the
switch running your monitor port.

That said, there are programs other than Wireshark that are perhaps
better-suited to analyzing your bandwidth utilization. If you have a Linux
machine available (or could maybe boot your sniffer computer using a live
CD like Knoppix[1]), iptraf[2] will do bandwidth analysis on a per-station
basis (i.e., it'll show the top network nodes by amount of data
transferred). iptraf calls this feature "LAN station monitor". Because
it's analyzing the raw Ethernet transfer (including non-IP protocols like
AppleTalk and IPX/SPX), it lists each station by MAC address, but it's
pretty easy to find out which MAC owns a given IP from the command line
with:

	arp -a | grep -i 00:ma:ca:dd:re:ss

(You have to add the colons yourself, as iptraf leaves them out.)

Additionally, if your switch(es) and firewall support SNMP queries, you
could install Cacti[1], which can graph all transfer on all ports in
five-minute increments with a minimum of configuration. (This also assumes
that you have a Linux machine at your disposal on the LAN, though.)

Hope this helps. Let me know if you have questions.

Cheers,

-sth

[1] http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html
[2] http://iptraf.seul.org
[3] http://www.cacti.net

+-------
  Sam Hooker [log in to unmask]		|
  Consulting Engineer, Partner			|
  ClearBearing, Inc. (802)846-1855 		|
  Internet engineering | network services	|
  http://www.clearbearing.com			|
+-------


> Date:    Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:29:19 -0400
> From:    Bryan Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Ethereal (Network Sniffing Advice)
>
> All,
>
> I have a funny story to tell you, but I also have a question.
>
> Yesterday, our e-mail server kept timing out, and our Internet
> connection was at a crawl for many hours of the day. I called
> SoverNet, our Internet provider, and I was told that we were using
> our entire bandwidth. This morning, same thing. I decided to
> download, and install ethereal on a windows box, and I started
> sniffing - yes, without reading the manual. While the program was
> sniffing, I got a call from [someone] in the district that has very
> few security restrictions because this [someone] can be trusted, and
> needs more access than other people. Anyhow, this person was needed
> help with something else in his/her room, which I fixed, but then
> said person said his/her computer was acting slow, and wondered if he/
> she stopped a few downloads if it would speed up her computer. I took
> a look, and said person was downloading 28 large files at one time.
> We discussed what happens when too many large files are downloaded at
> one time, and that problem was resolved.
>
> This is a funny story because I accidentally found the problem, but
> I'd like to know more about sniffing programs. The data that I got
> back from ethereal, out of the box didn't help me find the problem
> right away - I did only run it for a minute though just to play with
> it. Can anyone give me advice on reading ethereal data, or any other
> network sniffing solutions? Also, I installed ethereal on a regular
> PC box in my office - I'm guessing the box should be in front of our
> firewall to get better data, or maybe right behind it, as I wouldn't
> be able to see our internal IP addresses in front of it?
>
> Thanks,
> Bryan
>
> Bryan Thompson
> Technology Coordinator
> Winooski School District
> 60 Normand Street
> Winooski, VT 05404
> 802-655-2555

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager