LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  April 2007

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE April 2007

Subject:

Requiem for the Honeybee

From:

Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:12:35 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (125 lines)

Requiem for the Honeybee

includes the relationship between genetically engineered crops and 
Bayer's imidacloprid insecticides.


Neonicotinoid insecticides used both in sprays and seed dressing may 
be responsible for the collapse of honeybee colonies.
by Prof. Joe Cummins

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/requiemForTheHoneybee.php


eonicotinoid insecticides are harmful to the honeybee

There has been a great deal of concern over the decline of the 
honeybee across the US, Europe and Australia [1] (The Mystery of 
Disappearing Honeybees, this series). The United States National 
Research Council (USNRC) Committee of the Status of Pollinators in 
North America report [2] focused on the impact of parasites, fungi, 
bacteria and viruses, but did not pay much attention on the impact of 
pesticides and genetically modified (GM) crops, which may have lethal 
or sub-lethal effects on the bee's behaviour or resistance to 
infection. There have been strong responses to the report on that 
account. On the other hand, any suggestion that GM crops and 
pesticides may be causing the decline of honeybees is met with heated 
denial from the proponents.

Certainly, honeybees are declining both in areas where GM crops are 
widely grown, and in other areas where GM crops are released in small 
test plots. Is there a common thread that links both areas?  Yes 
there is, the universal use of systemic pesticide seed dressing in GM 
crops and conventional crops; in particular, the widespread 
application of a relatively new class of systemic insecticides - the 
neonicotinoids - that are highly toxic to insects including bees at 
very low concentrations. Systemic pesticide seed dressings protect 
the newly sprouted seed at a vulnerable time in the plant's 
development. Seed dressings include systemic insecticides and 
fungicides, which often act synergistically in controlling early 
seedling pests.

The neonicotinoid insecticides include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, 
clothianidin, and several others. Imidacloprid is used extensively in 
seed dressing for field and horticultural crops, and particularly for 
maize, sunflower and rapeseed (canola). Imidacloprid was detected in 
soils, plant tissues and pollen using HPLC coupled to a mass 
spectrometer. The levels of the insecticide found in pollen suggested 
probable delirious effects on honeybees [3]. For several years since 
2000, French and Italian beekeepers have been noticing that 
imidacloprid is lethal to bees, and the insecticide is suspected to 
be causing the decline of hive populations by affecting the bee's 
orientation and ability to return to the hive.

Confused and disoriented bees

A team of scientist led by the National Institute of Beekeeping in 
Bologna, Italy, found that pollen obtained from seeds dressed with 
imidacloprid contains significant levels of the insesticide, and 
suggested that the polluted pollen was one of the main causes of 
honeybee colony collapse [4]. Analysis of maize and sunflower crops 
originating from seeds dressed with imidacloprid indicated that large 
amounts of the insecticide will be carried back to honey bee colonies 
[5]. Sub-lethal doses of imidacloprid in sucrose solution affected 
homing and foraging activity of honeybees. Bees fed with 500 or 1 000 
ppb (parts per billion) of the insecticide in sucrose solutions 
failed to return to the hive and disappeared altogether, while bees 
that had imbibed 100 ppb solutions were delayed for 24 h compared 
with controls [6]. Imidacloprid in sucrose solution fed to the bees 
in the laboratory impaired their communication for a few hours [7]. 
Sub-lethal doses of imidacloprid in laboratory and field experiment 
decreased flight activity and olfactory discrimination, and olfactory 
learning performance was impaired [8].

Bayer corporation scientists reported that neither honeybees exposed 
to imidacloprid in sunflower seeds dressed with the insecticide [9] 
nor maize seeds dressed with the insecticide or released from the 
seeds during planting [10] were detrimental to honeybees. The Bayer 
studies did not deal with sub-lethal behaviour of intoxicated bees. 
An independent study found that imidacloprid was released to the 
environment from treated maize seeds during seed planting [11]. Bayer 
eco-toxicologists directed harsh criticisms at reports showing lethal 
or sub-lethal toxic effects of imidicloprid seed dressing and 
concluded that imidacloprid does not pose any significant risk to 
honeybees in the field [12], without, however, disproving the 
findings. It is simply yet another case of the anti-precaution 
principle being applied [13] (Use and Abuse of the Precautionary 
Principle, ISIS News 6)

Turning to GM crops such as maize, canola, cotton and soybean it is 
clear that all of these GM crops, with or without Bt genes, use seeds 
most of which are coated with neonicotinoid pesticides highly toxic 
to honey bees.  For example, Herculex maize with Bt genes to control 
rootworm, like Yieldgard corn borer resistant maize, is planted with 
seeds dressed with a neonicotinoid insecticide and a fungicide. 
Furthermore, the GM planting requires setting aside plots of non-GM 
maize making up 20 percent of the planted area as a "refuge" to 
discourage the evolution of resistant insects.  But the "refuge" is 
sprayed with neonicotinoid pesticide to protect its yield [14], and 
is more like a death camp for insects. Monsanto's US Patent 6,660,690 
provides for coating GM seeds with chemical pesticides [15].

Toxicology known

The toxicology of neonicotinoid insecticides is well known. The 
insecticides are inhibitors of acetycholine receptors (i.e., they are 
nerve poisons).  They have low toxicity for mammals, birds and fish, 
and are used to control fleas on dogs and cats [16]. The nicotinic 
acetylcholine receptor gene family of the honeybee has been studied; 
it has 11 subunit members, a larger number than the fruit fly or 
mosquito. The genes for the subunits employ alternatively spliced 
transcripts to increase receptor diversity, and the messenger RNAs 
are edited to replace specific A bases with I bases. Information on 
the receptor should allow for development of insecticides that are 
not harmful to bees [17].

In conclusion, the US NRC Committee did not deal with the heated 
debate over neonicotinoid pesticides and honeybee decline. Instead, 
that it seemed to suffer from tunnel vision and to be overcautious 
about matters that threaten large corporations.

We urgently need a thoroughly independent committee to consider the 
full range of factors that may be contributing to the decline of 
bees, including pesticides, GM crops and electronic devices, before 
the bees become extinct.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager