Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

July 2007

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home
SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE July 2007

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Cuba trip and AAAS session
From:
Eric Entemann <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:17:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
I agree with Herb, and was just about to post something similar re "no SftP" 
and "liability".

Should we tell people at the AAAS meeting, "Hey, we all belong to the SftP 
Listserve..."?

SftP used to be a vibrant organization, not without structural problems and 
internal conflict.  It was certainly a very important part of my life for 
many yy back in the day, as it was for Herb, Jon Beckwith, Bob Lange, George 
Salzman and others on the listserve who were in the Boston chapter,  and 
others who were in chapters of SftP in many other locations.  I was also in 
the Stony Brook (NY) chapter before I moved to Boston in '74.

----Original Message Follows----
From: herb fox <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Science for the People Discussion List              
<[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Cuba trip and AAAS session
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:37:05 -0400

Apparently you guys who correctly speak for openness missed the point for 
which i must accept responsibility by not having been clear.  The two 
reasons for my suggestion are:

   1. There is no SftP.  Why pretend?  We are participants on a list serve.
   2. There is some liability problem, i believe, in using the name.      
Check w/ Jon Beckwith

herb

PS
Frankly i was initially a bit stung by the reading you guys gave my remark.  
So many times from the late forties through the seventies.i returned home as 
the sole breadwinner to tell my wife and then 4 children that we'd have to 
tighten our belts for awhile 'till i found new employment because of my open 
stand as a radical.  Circumstances prevented me from responding to your 
emails immediately.  A good thing, because later i realized it was my 
inference not your implication that my untarnished record of openness, even 
when a member of supposedly clandestine organizations, was being sullied.  
Another example that hasty responses to emails are unwise.
hf

_________________________________________________________________
Like puzzles? Play free games & earn great prizes. Play Clink now. 
http://club.live.com/clink.aspx?icid=clink_hotmailtextlink2

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV