LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  July 2007

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE July 2007

Subject:

Re: Will Sicko spark a movement?

From:

Ivan Handler <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 5 Jul 2007 07:14:19 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (323 lines)

Sicko can not spark a movement that already exists.  The Campaign for 
Better Healthcare has been around for years and has working on a state 
by state strategy (similar to what happened in Canada) to achieve 
universal, single payor healthcare.  Moore has had representatives speak 
at rallies for the opening of the film all over the US in addition to 
the groups listed in the article. 

I think the gist of this article is in many ways is to discount the 
actual movement that exists and to instead criticize what many 
politicians are putting forward in an attempt to appease the insurance 
companies.  From what I understand, politicians still do not feel there 
is enough support to cut the insurance companies out.  This can't happen 
until there is a large enough movement to support such a  move.  As a 
consequence, the actual proposals on the table nation-wide appear to be 
along the lines of subsidizing insurance companies.  That is certainly 
true here in Illinois.

But no progressives who are proposing these solutions are proposing them 
as the final step.  They are merely a first step to get consensus behind 
universal coverage.  Posing this approach against single payer is one of 
the reasons that the left forces who do this remain isolated and 
marginalized (by no means do all left forces take this view).  Right now 
is an opportunity to actually get out there with the masses and organize 
around this issue.  Moore and others are great allies.  I think what is 
needed as an approach is a "yes, but" approach to work with middle force 
rather than the straight up "no" approach that we see here in Illinois 
and that has for the most part knocked the most progressive healthcare 
organization, Health and Medicine, out of the action.

What the politicians put forward will always represent the most right 
interpretation that is possible.  That is why we need to focus on 
organizing the masses around the next step and the next step after 
that.  This is how we build a movement in reality, organizing over a 
good idea with no credible organizing strategy is just pissing in the 
wind.  It might make some of it boosters feel good, but it is 
objectively apolitical in my mind, it does not take into account actual 
political forces and how to actually move forward.

-- Ivan

Phil Gasper wrote:
> http://socialistworker.org/2007-2/637/637_04_Movement.shtml
>
> *Will Sicko spark a movement?*
>
> July 6, 2007 | Pages 4 and 5
>
> ALAN MAASS reports on the overwhelming response to Michael Moore's 
> Sicko--and the potential of a movement to win fundamental change.
>
> MICHAEL MOORE'S film Sicko has become a lightning rod for all the 
> anger with the U.S. health care system--and activists who support 
> radical health care reform were on hand to show tens of thousands of 
> people who saw the film what they can do about it.
>
> At sneak previews across the country last month, the red carpet 
> outside the theater wasn't for preening and paparazzi, but picket lines.
>
> Members of the California Nurses Association (CNA) traveled to the 
> premieres on a bright red bus that let them off to hold protests and 
> pass out information before each screening. Also on the bus were 
> representatives of Physicians for a National Health Program and a 
> number of other unions, including state chapters of the American 
> Nurses Association, the United Steel Workers and the Communications 
> Workers of America.
> The tour was capped off with a turnout of nurses and doctors at 
> theaters in 30 cities when the film officially opened to sold-out 
> audiences June 29.
>
> Some reporters from the mainstream media complained that chanting 
> nurses interfered with their red-carpet interviews of Moore, but the 
> activists got a warmer greeting from audience members.
>
> "I think that one of most notable things was how universal the 
> response was, no matter which city we went to," said Jan Rodolfo, a 
> CNA member and nurse at the Alta Bates Summit Medical Center in 
> Oakland, Calif., who traveled across the country on the bus.
>
> In Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., said Rodolfo, the first five rows 
> of the theater were reserved for nurses, and in New York, the CNA 
> members escorted Moore into the theater and stood with him as he 
> introduced the film. "In every premiere, there were people weeping," 
> she said. "And when the film was over, there were people walking out 
> of the theater, just demanding to know what they could do to change 
> things."
>
> According to the CNA, at least 10,000 nurses have signed up to help in 
> a campaign to win legislation from Congress creating a "single-payer" 
> system that would cut out private insurance companies, and expand a 
> vastly improved Medicare system to cover every person in the country.
>
> "There were huge numbers of nurses, in particular, coming out in the 
> different cities, who had never been involved in unions or health care 
> reform activism before, and who were just beyond excited to be there 
> and wanting to get involved for the first time," Rodolfo said.
>
> The impact of the movie was felt beyond the theaters where the 
> activists turned out.
>
> A movie reviewer in Dallas--the heart of Bush country--described how 
> he emerged from the bathroom after a screening to find that "[t]he 
> entire Sicko audience had somehow formed an impromptu town hall 
> meeting in front of the ladies room...[H]ere these people were, 
> complete strangers from every walk of life, talking excitedly about 
> the movie. It was as if they simply couldn't go home without doing 
> something drastic about what they'd just seen."
>
> The meeting ended, said the reviewer, with an exchange of e-mail 
> addresses and plans to "get together and do something...It was like I 
> was standing there at the birth of a new political movement."
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> SICKO IS perfectly made to give form to the simmering bitterness with 
> U.S. health care system. Its focus is on the victims of the system--in 
> particular, people who thought they were fully covered, but discovered 
> they really weren't when they needed it.
>
> That's a familiar story--as Moore learned when he made an appeal on 
> YouTube for people to reach him with their "health care horror 
> stories." In the first 24 hours, he got than 3,700 responses. More 
> than 25,000 people had contacted him by the time a week had passed.
>
> People often live through their own health care nightmares without a 
> sense that the system is a source of frustration for millions of other 
> people throughout U.S. society. Sicko is changing that.
>
> Politicians of both parties are alert to the discontent. But their 
> rhetorical flair in sympathizing with victims of the health care 
> system hasn't been matched by action.
>
> The latest mantra among politicians of both parties is "universal 
> health coverage." Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney claims 
> he achieved it with a Massachusetts law passed while he was governor, 
> and Oregon's Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden says this is the goal of his 
> Healthy Americans Act, proposed in Congress late last year.
>
> But in reality, these bipartisan proposals would be a cash cow for the 
> insurance industry--and would worsen the health care crisis facing 
> working people.
>
> In Massachusetts, for example, Romney's "universal coverage" proposal 
> requires all residents to be signed up with a health insurance plan by 
> the beginning of this month, or face a stiff penalty on state income 
> taxes. On the other hand, fines for companies that don't meet 
> requirements for providing health coverage for employees are a drop in 
> the bucket.
>
> The effect of the law will be to undermine the already ailing 
> employer-provided insurance system, while driving the uninsured into 
> stripped-down insurance plans, with high deductibles and out-of-pocket 
> costs--the very plans that Sicko took special aim at.
>
> Instead, Sicko stakes out the case for a real alternative--a 
> single-payer system that eliminates private insurance and covers everyone.
>
> That's created an awkward situation for the leading Democratic 
> presidential candidates, who have put forward health care proposals 
> that, on closer look, have a lot in common with the "universal 
> coverage" shell game. As the Los Angeles Times reported, Hillary 
> Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards "all have staked out positions 
> sharply at odds with Moore's approach. But none of them is eager to 
> have that fact dragged into the spotlight."
>
> The liberal Internet network MoveOn.org tried to blur the differences 
> between Moore's call for fundamental change and the Democrats' proposals.
>
> "Several 2008 candidates--John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich, and Barack 
> Obama--have plans to guarantee affordable health care for everyone 
> with a public insurance option," MoveOn said in an e-mail to members. 
> "These are the most forward-thinking proposals ever seen in a 
> presidential race."
>
> But only Kucinich supports single-payer legislation. Edwards' and 
> Obama's plans fall short of "guaranteeing affordable health care for 
> everyone."
>
> As for these being the "most-forward thinking proposals ever seen in a 
> presidential race," Democrat Harry Truman backed a far more radical 
> national health insurance plan in his 1948 presidential campaign, and 
> for decades after, Democrats regularly affirmed their commitment to 
> this goal--though they didn't do much to work toward it.
>
> On its bus tour, the CNA challenged not only Democrats but other 
> unions that have made concessions to the health care industry, rather 
> than commit to a single-payer proposal.
>
> CNA Executive Director Rose Ann DeMoro accused the Service Employees 
> International Union (SEIU) in particular of giving cover to 
> politicians who refuse to support legislation for a single-payer 
> system. "[I]t makes [the politicians] look like they are accomplishing 
> something when in fact they are accomplishing nothing," DeMoro told 
> the Corporate Crime Reporter.
>
> The proposals put forward by Clinton, Edwards and Obama are the 
> product of 30 years of retreat and rightward shifts in official 
> Washington politics.
>
> By contrast, ordinary people are clearly ready for much stronger 
> measures. According to a CNN poll in May, 64 percent of people said 
> they thought the government should "provide a national health 
> insurance program for all Americans, even if this would require higher 
> taxes." A New York Times/CBS poll in February found that six in 10 
> people were willing to pay higher taxes so that everyone had insurance.
>
> According to the Public Policy Institute of California, its survey 
> found that "by a two-to-one margin, most prefer 'a universal health 
> insurance program in which everyone is covered under a program like 
> Medicare that is run by the government and financed by the taxpayers' 
> nationally to 'the current health insurance system in the United 
> States, in which most people get their health insurance from private 
> employers, but some people have no insurance.'"
>
> As Rodolfo pointed out, "The public in general in the U.S. is ready 
> for some kind of universal health care, but it isn't clear enough 
> about what that needs to look like." If a case isn't made for a 
> genuine alternative, she said, it's easy for people to be pulled 
> toward one of the more "realistic" proposals.
>
> "[M]y sense is that up until this movie came out, you could be Hillary 
> Clinton or Barack Obama or John Edwards--or even Rudolph Giuliani or 
> Mitt Romney--and be out there talking about supporting universal 
> health care, and the folks you're talking to weren't looking for a 
> distinction in terms of what that actually meant," Rodolfo said.
>
> "So my hope now is that any time one of these politicians stands up 
> and advocates for health care reform that would expand the private 
> health insurance industry, people are going to stand up and go, wait a 
> second, the health insurance industry is the problem, not the solution.
>
> "I'm hoping that the movie is going to bring a new consciousness about 
> the role of insurance companies, in particular, as the root of the 
> problem, and it will really refocus things on single-payer."
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> THE SINGLE-payer legislation sponsored by Reps. John Conyers and 
> Dennis Kucinich is a stark contrast to the half-measures and 
> concessions to industry floated by other politicians.
>
> Known as HR 676, it would create a comprehensive system under which 
> everyone--all U.S. residents, regardless of immigration status, from 
> cradle to grave--is covered by a single, government-administered 
> health program. The proposal would forbid "a private health insurer to 
> sell health insurance coverage that duplicates the benefits provided" 
> under the government system.
>
> The bill would allow a mix of private and public health care 
> providers, but all private companies would have to convert to 
> not-for-profit status--though over a too-generous 15-year "transition" 
> period.
>
> Estimates of funding for the program are $1.9 trillion a year--to be 
> raised through the already existing Medicare tax on employees and 
> employers, an additional payroll tax on employers (which nevertheless 
> would still pay less per worker for health care than under the current 
> system), and increased taxes on the wealthy and big corporations and 
> banks.
>
> Mainstream politicians claim that a single-payer system is a pipe 
> dream--and that their "universal coverage" proposals are more "realistic."
>
> But the problem, as Sicko makes clear, is built into the fabric of a 
> privatized system. As Nation reviewer Christopher Hayes put it, Sicko 
> shows why "if single-payer is ever going to come to America, it's 
> going to be over the insurance companies' dead bodies."
>
> A single-payer system would be only a first step toward truly rational 
> health care. For example, though the government system would negotiate 
> a better deal on drug prices, pharmaceutical companies would remain 
> private. And in other countries with national health care, any 
> restrictions in coverage have served as the means for private insurers 
> to undermine the state system by "supplementing" it.
>
> But a single-payer system in the U.S. would be a huge advance. Above 
> all, it would establish in the U.S. the principle that exists in other 
> industrialized countries--that health care is a right, guaranteed to 
> everyone. The fundamental priority, as left-wing British Labour Party 
> leader Tony Benn says in Sicko, "is solidarity."
>
> The health care industry won't give in without a sustained 
> struggle--one that organizes health care providers as part of a 
> broader political mobilization to demand change.
> It will take more than a movie to win the kind of dramatic change 
> that's needed to begin fixing the American health care system. But 
> this movie--along with the efforts of the activists who greeted 
> viewers outside the theaters with information on how to get 
> involved--could be the first spark of a new movement.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *What you can do*
> Go to the California Nurses Association <http://www.calnurse.org/> Web 
> site for more information on the activist campaign accompanying the 
> movie Sicko. The CNA's Guaranteed Healthcare 
> <http://www.guaranteedhealthcare.org/> Web site is filled with health 
> care horror stories from both patients and providers, plus ideas of 
> how to get involved in organizing for a change.
>
> The Physicians for a National Health Program <http://www.pnhp.org/> 
> Web site makes the case for a government-administered single-payer 
> program and has information on single-payer legislation sponsored by 
> Rep. John Conyers. Healthcare-Now <http://www.healthcare-now.org/> 
> posts a regularly updated calendar showing events around the issue of 
> health care.
> For a compact history of U.S. health care policy and the struggles for 
> a national health program, from the progressive era to today, read/ 
> One Nation, Uninsured: Why the U.S. Has No National Health Insurance/, 
> by Jill Quadagno. Donald Barlett and James Steele's/ Critical 
> Condition: How Health Care in America Became Big Business--and Bad 
> Medicine/ is a fact-packed expose of the for-profit health care industry.
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> No viruses found in incoming message
> Scanned by *iolo AntiVirus® 1.1.10.7*
> http://www.iolo.com <http://www.iolo.com/iav/iavpop3>
>



_______________________________________
No viruses found in outgoing message
Scanned by iolo AntiVirus® 1.1.10.7
http://www.iolo.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager