Yes you havr a young Black-billed Cuckoo. Alot of wonderful pic's/ The
last Kingfisher picture from the marsh is a juvenile. Young swallow is a
Barn Swallow. Great picture of the young Yellow Warber with an adult.
Nancy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julie Waters" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 9:10 PM
Subject: [VTBIRD] Is this an immature black-billed cuckoo?
>I spotted a bird at Allen Brothers Marsh this morning which really confused
>me at first until Cyndi did some good sleuthing, and we think it's a
>juvenile black-billed cuckoo, but some verification from experienced
>birders would be appreciated:
>
> http://juliesmagiclightshow.com/?pic=1883
> http://juliesmagiclightshow.com/?pic=1882
>
> This was not in the marsh part by the median, but seen from the Allen
> Bros. parking lot immediately before the marsh -- I stopped off there to
> look because I heard bird calls I didn't recognize (I couldn't tell you
> what they were now-- I heard a -lot- of bird calls once I stopped and my
> brain is full).
>
> Also, some nice pictures both yesterday and today; mostly Allen Bros.
> Marsh but the b&w warbler was at home and the broad-winged hawk was on the
> dirt road past Allen Bros. Marsh up towards rte 121.
>
> Yesterday, there was a black and white warbler, a cedar waxwing and wood
> ducks, as well as a mystery bug if anyone wants to help me ID it:
>
> http://juliesmagiclightshow.com/?dte=2007-07-13&dategroup=none&smy=s&tc=58&keywords=
>
> Today, there were baby geese, cliff (? I think-- help with this would be
> good, too) swallows, yellow warblers (baby and adult), a broad-winged hawk
> and a belted kingfisher:
>
> http://juliesmagiclightshow.com/?dte=2007-07-14&dategroup=none&smy=s&tc=58&keywords=birds&exc=and&keywords2=nature
>
> Enjoy,
>
> --julie
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [log in to unmask] http://juliewaters.com/
>
> We've heard that a million monkeys at a million
> keyboards could produce the Complete Works of
> Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
> this is not true.
>
> --Robert Wilensky
>
|