I am not sure of the exact origin, but Act 250 declared that all contiguous
land in one ownership is one parcel, regardless of how the deeds read. That
has been somewhat modified by court decisions, but the law still stands.
Bruce in Eden.
------- Original Message -------
From : Wendy[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent : 3/31/2008 5:27:20 PM
To : [log in to unmask]
Cc :
Subject : RE: Re: Contiguous lots
Most likely.
Wendy L. Wilton
Rutland City Treasurer
802-773-1800
802-773-1809
fax
[log in to unmask]
From: Vermont
Municipal Government Discussion Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Roberta Dana
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 3:37
PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Contiguous lots
Mu understanding is that if the land is contiguous and is owned by
the "exact" same person then it must be considered as one
parcel. Maybe this has a connection to the $$$ per parcel the state sends
us to maintain the grand list???? Less parcels, less $$ the town
receives.
Roberta Dana
Town Treasurer & Tax Collector
Groton, VT
802-584-3131
[log in to unmask]
----- Original
Message -----
From: Wendy
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Monday,
March 31, 2008 3:23 PM
Subject: Contiguous
lots
Is there a state law that demands that
adjacent lots, owned by the same person, must be condensed under one SPAN # for
purposes of assessment and taxation? Or is the discretion of the lister?
Wendy L. Wilton
Rutland City Treasurer
802-773-1800
802-773-1809
fax
[log in to unmask]
|
