LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  April 2008

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE April 2008

Subject:

Agribusiness profit drive threatens ecosystem

From:

Louis Proyect <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:54:55 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (177 lines)

NY Times, April 9, 2008
The Food Chain
As Prices Rise, Farmers Spurn Conservation Program
By DAVID STREITFELD

Out on the farm, the ducks and pheasants are losing ground.

Thousands of farmers are taking their fields out of the government’s 
biggest conservation program, which pays them not to cultivate. They are 
spurning guaranteed annual payments for a chance to cash in on the boom 
in wheat, soybeans, corn and other crops. Last fall, they took back as 
many acres as are in Rhode Island and Delaware combined.

Environmental and hunting groups are warning that years of progress 
could soon be lost, particularly with the native prairie in the Upper 
Midwest. But a broad coalition of baking, poultry, snack food, ethanol 
and livestock groups say bigger harvests are a more important priority 
than habitats for waterfowl and other wildlife. They want the government 
to ease restrictions on the preserved land, which would encourage many 
more farmers to think beyond conservation.

Kerry Dockter, a rancher in Denhoff, N.D., has about 450 acres of 
grassland in the program. “When this program first came about, it was a 
pretty good thing,” he said. “But times have definitely changed.”

The government payments, Mr. Dockter said, “aren’t even comparable 
anymore” to what he could make by working the land. He plans to devote 
some of his conservation acres to growing feed for his cows and some to 
grazing. He might also lease some land to neighbors.

For years, the problem with cropland was that there was too much of it, 
which kept food prices low to the benefit of consumers and the detriment 
of farmers.

Now, because of a growing global middle class as well as federal 
mandates to turn large amounts of corn into ethanol-based fuel, food 
prices are beginning to jump. Cropland is suddenly in heavy demand, a 
situation that is fraying old alliances, inspiring new ones and putting 
pressure on the Agriculture Department, which is being lobbied directly 
by all sides without managing to satisfy any of them.

Born nearly 25 years ago in an era of abundance, the Conservation 
Reserve Program is having a rough transition to the age of scarcity. Its 
35 million acres — about 8 percent of the cropland in the country — are 
the big prize in this brawl.

Groups like Ducks Unlimited and Pheasants Forever want the government to 
raise rental rates to keep the same amount of land in the program or 
even increase it. While offering more money to farmers might be a 
difficult sell in a year of record farm profits, Jim Ringelman of Ducks 
Unlimited said, “There are overriding environmental issues here.”

The bakers and their allies have a different set of overriding issues: 
high commodity prices. The rising cost of feed is hurting ranchers, the 
rising cost of corn is hurting ethanol producers and the rising cost of 
wheat is hurting bread makers.

“We’re in a crisis here. Do we want to eat, or do we want to worry about 
the birds?” asked JR Paterakis, a Baltimore baker who said he was so 
distressed at a meeting last month with Edward T. Schafer, the 
agriculture secretary, that he stood up and started speaking “vehemently.”

The Paterakis bakery, H&S, produces a million loaves of rye bread a 
week. The baker said he could not find the rye flour he needed at any 
price. That gives him two unwelcome options: close half of his 
operations starting in July, or experiment with a blended flour that 
will yield a different and possibly less-than-authentic rye bread.

Such problems were never contemplated when the Conservation Reserve was 
conceived as part of the 1985 Farm Bill. Participants bid to put their 
land in the program during special sign-ups, with the government 
selecting the acres most at risk environmentally. Average annual 
payments are $51 an acre. Contracts run for at least a decade and are 
nearly impossible to break — not that anyone wanted to until recently.

“Older farmers put their land in the program rather than renting to a 
younger farmer or selling,” said Dale Schuler, who grows wheat in Fort 
Benton, Mont. That made it difficult for farmers who wanted to expand as 
well as farm equipment dealers, supply co-ops and other services, which 
suffered declines in business.

“It’s certainly been a polarizing issue,” Mr. Schuler said. “Half the 
people love it and half the people hate it.”

While few urban dwellers ever heard of Conservation Reserve, it found 
support among two important constituents: hunters had more land to roam 
and more wildlife to seek out, with the Agriculture Department 
estimating that the duck population alone rose by two million; and 
environmentalists were pleased, too. No one disputes that there are real 
environmental benefits from the program, especially on land most prone 
to erosion.

The program peaked late last summer, with more than 400,000 farmers 
receiving nearly $1.8 billion for idling 36.8 million acres. Put all 
that land together and it would be bigger than the state of New York.

The group doing the most to undermine this amiable coexistence is the 
farmers themselves. Last fall, when five million acres in Conservation 
Reserve came up for renewal, only half of them were re-entered. While 
the program has gained some high-priority land in the last few months, 
in part from an initiative to restore bobwhite quail habitats, the net 
loss is still more than two million acres.

That is just the beginning, warns Ducks Unlimited, a politically potent 
organization with more than half a million members in the United States. 
Ducks Unlimited is concerned about the three-quarters of a million acres 
of grassland that were removed from the program last year in the 
so-called duck factory in the Upper Midwest.

“We foresee a dramatic reduction,” said Mr. Ringelman, a conservation 
director for the association.

Ardell Magnusson, a farmer in Roseau, Minn., shows the changing mood. He 
said the program was “a godsend” when he put 300 of his 2,300 acres into 
it eight years ago. “I needed some guaranteed income or my banker was 
going to tell me to find another occupation,” Mr. Magnusson said. It is 
not exactly a bonanza: he gets about $12,000 a year.

He calculates he can make more than that by farming sunflowers or wheat 
or soybeans. When his contract expires in two years, he plans to 
withdraw about half his land. It would not be a shock if the Agriculture 
Department cut him loose sooner. “Another nine months of wheat at 
today’s prices and there will be political pressure on this program like 
you wouldn’t believe,” Mr. Magnusson said.

That pressure is exactly what the bakers and their allies are aiming 
for, saying the Conservation Reserve costs taxpayers and hurts consumers.

“This program is taking money out of your pocket twice a day,” said Jay 
Truitt, vice president for government affairs for the National 
Cattlemen’s Beef Association. “Do you think it’s right for you to pay so 
there’s more quail in Kansas?”

The cattlemen and bakers argue that farmers should immediately be 
allowed to take as much as nine million acres out of the Conservation 
Reserve without paying a penalty, something they say would not harm the 
environment.

“The pipeline for wheat is empty,” said Michael Kalupa, a bakery owner 
in Tampa, Fla., who is president of the Retail Bakers of America. Mr. 
Kalupa said the price he paid for flour had doubled since October. He 
cannot afford to absorb the cost and he cannot afford to pass it on. 
Sales have been falling 16 percent to 20 percent a month since October. 
He has laid off three employees.

Among farmers, the notion of early releases from conservation contracts 
is prompting sharp disagreement and even anger. The American Soybean 
Association is in favor. “We need more food,” said John Hoffman, the 
association’s president.

The National Association of Wheat Growers is against, saying it believes 
“in the sanctity of contracts.” It does not want more crops to be grown, 
because commodity prices might go down.

That is something many of its members say they cannot afford, even with 
wheat at a robust $9 a bushel. Their own costs have increased, with 
diesel fuel and fertilizer up sharply. “It would decrease my profit 
margin, which is slim,” said Jeff Krehbiel of Hydro, Okla. “Let’s hurt 
the farmer in order to shut the bakers up, is that what we’re saying?”

Mr. Krehbiel said his break-even last year was $4 a bushel. This summer 
it will be $6.20; the next crop, $7.75.

In the struggle between those who would shrink the program and those who 
would bolster it, the Agriculture Department is leaning toward the 
latter. When Mr. Schafer spoke recently before wildlife and hunting 
groups in Phoenix, he opened the door to significantly raising rents on 
new land.

Randy Schuring, a dairy farmer with 200 acres in the program, said there 
was no possible solution that would make everyone happy.

“If the government lets the land out and then crop prices fall, that’s 
going to hurt a lot of farmers,” said Mr. Schuring, whose farm is in 
Andover, S.D. “If it doesn’t let the land out and prices keep going up, 
that will hurt a lot of consumers. If only we had a crystal ball.”

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager