LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  August 2008

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE August 2008

Subject:

Re: Censored topics: Clarification requested

From:

Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 5 Aug 2008 01:56:23 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (194 lines)

Censorship is always tricky business. Those who claim to know the 
Truth have generally asserted the right to impose that Truth on 
dissidents. I beg to differ.

It's one thing if we had a belligerant, single-topic miscreant 
posting frequently to this list. Then we might consider limiting his 
or her posts, putting them on "Moderator" status, and/or banning them 
outright -- NOT for the content of their posts but for their abuse of 
the stated process or list rules.

But it's quite another thing when someone like Jim West, who has done 
a lot of solid work with the No Spray Coalition and has helped us win 
a number of concessions in negotiations from the NYC government 
concerning pesticides spraying, is told arbitrarily that his posts on 
a particular subject are Out of Order and open to censorship.

Given that Jim West posts infrequently and usually courteously, it 
makes me highly suspicious when those who make their living in the 
very fields that Jim is critiquing rationalize moves to censor him, 
rather than simply hit the delete button if they don't like what he's saying.

Next, you'll find the same people moving to censor me for my comments 
against the Gardasil "vaccine" -- because, in their minds, the Truth 
about vaccines and viruses is already established. A very dangerous game ....


Mitchel



At 10:16 AM 8/3/2008, you wrote:
>but c'mon Mitchel!  Lets say this list was "Geography for the 
>People" and there was some guy who was insisting the world is flat 
>and trying to debunk the evidence that the world is round.  There 
>would be something of a consensus in the world that the world was 
>round, but of course there is some fraction of people who will 
>insist otherwise.
>
>Why should a list allow that conversation about round or flat when 
>its such a colossal waste of time?
>
>What meaning would an argument have about having open minds on that topic?
>
>In my book, 1) that issue is a not worth the bandwidth 2) the issue 
>of open minds is not germane to established fact.
>
>
>
>>One reason not to ban information on this list is because people -- 
>>well, I for one -- learn from the information  presented, even when 
>>I disagree with portions of it.
>>
>>It's not about the "convincing" or attempts thereof. It's about the 
>>process of keeping an open mind. Those who do have not foreclosed 
>>learning. This list is not only for those who already have closed 
>>their minds. It would be a terrible shame to impose that 
>>methodology on the rest of us.
>>
>>Mitchel Cohen
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Michael H Goldhaber <[log in to unmask]>
>>>Sent: Aug 2, 2008 2:46 PM
>>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>>Subject: Re: Censored topics: Clarification requested
>>>
>>>Basically (3): criticizing the view  that infection with HIV is a 
>>>necessary precursor to AIDS. Most of us have no doubt of the 
>>>correctness of that view, and we are not at all likely to be 
>>>convinced otherwise by any of the panoply of arguments you and 
>>>others have advanced or might in the future. You have fought the 
>>>good (?) fight. Why waste more breath on this?
>>>
>>>Best,
>>>Michael
>>>
>>>On Aug 2, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Jim West wrote:
>>>
>>>>  So that I don't break forum rules,
>>>>
>>>>  Which topic is censored?
>>>>
>>>>  1) Missing references in HIV papers.
>>>>
>>>>  2) Semantics of "virus isolation".
>>>>
>>>>  or
>>>>
>>>>  3) Any criticism of HIV theory.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Jim West
>>>>  www.geocities.com/noxot
>>>>
>>>>  ====
>>>>  On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:02:18 -0700, Michael H Goldhaber <[log in to unmask]
>>>>  > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>>  I asked you and others to stop posting on this topic. It is quite
>>>>>  clear to me that no evidence will persuade you. Likewise, you will  not
>>>>>  persuade most of us. If you post again on this, unless other list
>>>>>  members object, I will moderate all your posts and remove those on
>>>>>  this topic. That will delay all your posts, as I cannot be constantly
>>>>>  monitoring.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Michael
>>>>>  -------
>>>>>  Michael H. Goldhaber
>>>>>  SftP list moderator
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Aug 1, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Jim West wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Michael Goldhaber;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  You write:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  "Isolating an bioactive agent merely means being able to culture it
>>>>>>  from infected tissue, that is grow it in more or less pure form,  then
>>>>>>  detect the agent , say by electron microscopy and then use it to
>>>>>>  transmit the infection in some way."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  My response:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  "More or less pure" ??  That would mean the resulting observations
>>>>>>  would be
>>>>>>  "more or less pure".   In the case of many viruses, the virus is
>>>>>>  virtually
>>>>>>  undetectable in the "pure strain".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Inspired by definition of "isolating a bioactive agent", I have
>>>>>>  looked up a
>>>>>>  standard definition for "isolate" and it is contradicts you, unless
>>>>>>  you are
>>>>>>  accenting your phrase, "less pure".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  "Isolate: A sample from a defined source." -- Roger Hull, Fred
>>>>>>  Brown, Chris
>>>>>>  Payne, Virology: Directory and Dictionary of Animal, Bacterial, and
>>>>>>  Plant
>>>>>>  Viruses (1989)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Not very precise.  That could mean "mud from a pond".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Virus "isolation" seems to be a great... semantic achievement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Jim West
>>>>>>  www.geocities.com/noxot
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  =====
>>>>>>  On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:26:31 -0700, Michael H Goldhaber 
>>>>>> <[log in to unmask]
>>  >>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  1. Isolating an bioactive agent merely means being able to  culture it
>>>>>>>  from infected tissue, that is grow it in more or less pure form,  then
>>>>>>>  detect the agent , say by electron microscopy and then use it to
>>>>>>>  transmit the infection in some way. For anyone genuinely
>>>>>>>  interested,
>>>>>>>  I am sure any textbook on infectious diseases would explain this.
>>>>>>>  Such
>>>>>>>  books can be found in any medical library, and probably in any
>>>>>>>  hospital library.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  2. Likewise there are books and journals devoted to HIV/AIDs by now
>>>>>>>  that surely would provide numerous references to the isolation of  the
>>>>>>>  virus in many different laboratories.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  3. If you read further down the reference Michael Balter provided  you
>>>>>>>  will see citations related to isolating HIV from AIDS cases.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  4. Therefore, I think it is pretty clear that the people  questioning
>>>>>>>  the HIV hypothesis do not want to be enlightened on this subject,  and
>>>>>>>  are  finding utterly fake reasons to  continue to argue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  5. So please drop the subject. It is phony.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Michael
>>>>>>>  -------
>>>>>>>  Michael H. Goldhaber
>>>>>>>  SftP list moderator
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>
>
>--
>|||///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\|||O|||///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\|||
>Jose Morales Ph.D.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager