Michael Balter wrote:
>Let me put it another way. Herb raised the excellent question of who
>this list is for and what purpose it serves. I think most people on
>this list would agree that a Science for the People has to be based
>on solid science and not on pseudoscience, and that it is actually
>possible to come to a consensus about the difference between the
>two. That is why we don't debate global warming here, nor whether
>the earth is flat, and it is also why we should not debate whether
>HIV causes AIDS. I think the issue of censorship is a red herring,
>even if it is being raised by a true red.
Herrings of the world, unite!