i note that colin bradford who is quoted as saying neoliberal economics (eg growth) is unsustainable, the wrong way to go, etc. However he was at the world bank, which was a main purveyor of that agenda, and is at brookings, which also has many people on board who promote growth, sprawl, etc. I guess like Soros he has misgivings about the field which made him a fine living.
his current papers actually say one way towards 'global governance' is to drastically increase resources accessible to the IMF (another key player in both financial crises and non-sustainability). I imagine he may next suggest Dick Cheney will be the point person towards demilitarization of iraq and afghanistan, since he is an expert on the subject. (of course nixon did go to china).
--- On Sun, 6/14/09, Phil Gasper <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Phil Gasper <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: CLIMATE CHANGE: 'We Have Run Out of Time'
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Sunday, June 14, 2009, 10:39 PM
> CLIMATE CHANGE: 'We Have Run Out of
> CLIMATE CHANGE: 'We Have Run Out of
> By Julio Godoy
> ROME, Jun 14 (IPS) - New scientific research suggests that
> change is taking place faster than foreseen in studies
> considered so
> far, according to environmental experts at a forum on
> climate change
> called by the Global Legislators Organisation for a
> Environment (GLOBE).
> "We have run out of time," Ashok Khosla,
> president of the
> International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the
> largest environmental association, told IPS. "Climate
> change is
> happening at a swifter speed than we thought so far."
> Khosla, an Indian national, holds degrees in physics and
> sciences, and has taught and worked on environmental and
> economics since the 1970s. He leads several
> organisations committed to human development.
> Katherine Richardson, a leading marine biologist
> researching the
> effect of climate change effect on the oceans, told IPS,
> levels are rising 50 percent faster than expected by the
> Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
> "If humankind does not stop climate change in the
> future, at the observed present rate sea levels shall rise
> by at least
> one metre by the year 2010." This would aggravate the
> catastrophic consequences already forecast for human
> settlements along
> coasts, especially in the developing world, she said.
> The acidity of oceans' water is also increasing
> rapidly, Richardson
> said. "If nothing changes to stop global warming, by
> 2065 no
> region will have corals."
> This degradation of the oceans has been provoked by a fast
> rise in
> greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. "The emissions in
> the last
> three or four years were all above the estimated range of
> projections," Richardson said. "Since 1990,
> emissions have
> risen by 17 percent."
> This growth in GHG emissions since 1990 has important
> relative and
> absolute value because that year's emissions are used
> to measure
> reductions foreseen in the Kyoto protocol. Under Kyoto,
> countries agreed to reduce their collective GHG emissions
> by 5.2
> percent compared to 1990 levels.
> The growth is dramatic, because "societies and
> ecosystems are
> highly vulnerable to even modest levels of climate change.
> rises above two degrees Celsius will be very difficult for
> contemporary societies to cope with," Richardson
> Khosla said that conventional wisdom on climate change is
> that average
> rise in temperatures should not go beyond two degrees
> Celsius in order
> to keep rising concentration of carbon dioxide in the
> atmosphere below
> 400 parts per million (ppm).
> "But we are already at 387 ppm," Khosla said.
> "We have
> practically no time to stop this growth of greenhouse gases
> Despite intense international dialogue over the last 40
> years on the
> environmental consequences of economic growth, and almost
> 20 years of
> debates on how to tackle climate change and solve the
> crisis associated with global warming, "practically
> nothing has
> been reached so far," Ian Dunlop, an Australian
> economist and
> expert on energy told IPS.
> "Since 1972, when the Club of Rome published its study
> on the
> 'Limits of Growth', and outlined the problem of
> unsustainable economic
> growth, humankind has proved incapable of accepting, so
> far, that the
> most important factor for our own survival is the
> preservation of a
> biosphere fit for human habitation," Dunlop said. The
> Club of
> Rome is a global think-tank that carried out pioneering
> work on
> climate change.
> Richardson, Khosla, and Dunlop were in Rome Jun. 12-13 to
> in the international forum on climate change organised by
> GLOBE. The
> forum brought together more than 100 environmental
> legislators from 13
> countries, and several scientists and experts.
> Dunlop pointed out that because of the global economic
> industrialised nations are trying to encourage more
> "Governments are applying economic measures conceived
> some 80
> years ago to stimulate old industries and save banks, and
> by so doing
> are skyrocketing their deficits and debts, thus crowding
> investments in environmental policies," he said.
> The solutions for tackling climate change are clear, Dunlop
> "The problem is that vested interests, representing
> the old
> economy, which caused climate change, keep a tight hold of
> Khosla said the world is ravaged by a demographic crisis
> and by an
> unjust concentration of income, closely linked to a
> degradation of the environment.
> "The richest fifth of the world's population takes
> some 85
> percent of the world's income," Khosla said.
> "Meanwhile 2.5
> billion people, well over one- third of the world's
> population, must
> survive with less than two dollars per day."
> At the same time, the poorest people are the main victims
> of the
> environmental degradation associated with climate change
> and the
> depletion of nature by the present economic model.
> "Some three to
> four billion people are surviving on a landscape of
> vulnerability, and environmental degradation," Khosla
> New global policies must, he said, aim to increase human
> in the poorest countries to solve "the climate change
> paradox: by
> 2050, the world will have several billion extra tonnes of
> emissions, unless the poorest populations have access to
> higher levels
> of energy services." This is only possible with
> sustainable development, now, and for all inhabitants of
> Colin Bradford, economist at the Brookings Institute in the
> called on governments to "recover economics from
> ideologies." Since the 1970s, he said, following the
> rise to
> power of former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher
> and former
> U.S. president Ronald Reagan, "economics stopped to be
> a social
> science and became a prisoner of ideologues."
> These ideologues' belief that free markets would
> correct themselves,
> and set the prices right, "has proven utterly
> Bradford told IPS. "For instance, the oil market price
> is wrong,
> the carbon market price is wrong, both are too low."
> The prices of both have a strong impact on climate change.
> A low price
> makes both fossil fuels more competitive compared with
> energy sources. Scientists agree that the combustion of
> fossil fuels,
> which produces high amounts of carbon dioxide and other
> gases, is the main cause of global warming and climate