Yikes! The Google lesson contains several misspellings and some typos. I've always told my students that their audience will find them less credible if their writing contains poor grammar, punctuation, and spelling. I'm not a literature teacher, but I think the lesson for the Google presentation includes irony. ;)
Otherwise, Lucie, the information is helpful and emphasizes and important topic.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you received this communication in error and then delete it. Thank you.
>>> Lucie deLaBruere <[log in to unmask]> 11/2/2009 8:40 PM >>>
Seems like recently someone was asking about some new sites for their
These are a little late to that conversation, but I was working on
this tonight.. Here are some materials I'm perusing
Here is a full fledged lesson on critically analyzing websites with
powerpoint and more (it even refers to the mythbusters video that Val
used in kicking off this unit) I think it would tie in with the
essential question well
And a WebQuest on the subject:
FAKE websites (many with science related themes) along with a
worksheet and some lesson plans
and a few more
Tech Integration Specialist - St. Albans City Schoool
Work: 802 527 0565 x 3206
Cell: 802 752 6086
[log in to unmask]
Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.
- James M. Barrie