It's only $5 a year if you use the license for 10 years, and only upgrade
when support ends for the previous version. Who does that? If you buy
new licenses every time a new version is released, it's more like $15-$20.
Still a bargain, I suppose, but with 1100 computers on our campus, that's
We are transitioning from 2003 to 2007. We have occasionally run into
issues trying to run, for instance, powerpoints developed in 2007 and
saved in 2003's format on a machine with 2003. Mostly we uipgrade,
though, because the career center wants to be teaching it's kids the
latest version. They have articulation agreements with local community
colleges that demand it, in fact. Since I set up Office for automatic
deployment, it doesn't take any more of my time to install office than it
does to install the compatibility pack, anyhow.
Brattleboro Union High School District # 6
School Information Technology Discussion <[log in to unmask]> writes:
>OO isnt the only option ZoHo, Abiword and Gnumeric.
>We've stuck with 2003 and move that license to new machines as old ones
>retired. (which I am told is legal).
>We've had no issues with the 07 compatibility pack (thus far, and I can't
>what was the cost to install was ...)
>Microsoft Office @ $50 each over 10 years of mainstream support, the
>are miniscule compared to other costs to educate students. (I don't mean
>negatively, I mean it's a bargain).
>Seems odd to me that given the salary/benefit costs of any given
>one would even think of quibling over $5/year for office software ...
>There are hidden costs using OO, the first time that there is a issue
>conversion, and that file doesnt quite look right, how much payroll are
>going to burn through to get it resolved, how much payroll to get clipart
>enough' or rejigger your lesson plans ...
>However, if OO provides some competition and MSFT therefore makes a
>product or sells it to us cheaper, so be it.