Why not just reformat so it is compatible? Even if it takes some time, I
would think the labor cost would be far less than the cost of spreading more
M$ throughout the building... Plus you will need to re-invest in another few
years when M$ makes it's next change.
E
on 11/30/09 12:12 PM, Bill Clark wrote:
> The open source think is a worthy goal... we tried this with Open Office,
> installing it on all the library, classroom and dorm computers. It does a
> remarkable job.
>
> Unfortunately, because of the highly formatted, office2007 IEP form, there
> appear to be some compatibility issues (nothing MAJOR, but they exist, and
> have some folks frustrated...)
>
> I think we are headed to an all-microsoft office platform, for $70 per
> computer.
>
> Maybe I will ask to cash in the Symantec software renewal (replace with
> Security Essentials) for Microsoft Office licenses.
>
> Bill Clark
> Austine School
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: School Information Technology Discussion
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eric Hall
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 9:48 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Free Antivirus ...
>
> Of ALL people, I believe it is our responsibility as technology leaders to
> model appropriate use of licensed software, including the use of home-use
> shareware on our networks. I have spent years working with staff members who
> feel as if "it's for education, so it ought to be free," and asking me to
> buy software for their home computers. Ditto for software (Inspiration) that
> we do not own for all computers: "why can't you just put it on all of my
> computers?" or "Isn't it all site-licensed?"
>
> For this and other reasons we continue to seek open-source alternatives so
> that it really IS free for everyone!
>
> OH - we do continue to buy in to Symantec EPP, which (despite the load) has
> worked well for us. After the initial purchase, the renewal cost is
> reasonable.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>
>
> on 11/30/09 8:02 AM, Dave Tisdell wrote:
>
>> Hi Bryan,
>>
>> I was responding to this quote from Rick's post
>> " This is education and
>> dare I say, especially now, cutting corners might be defensible.
>> I would suggest that Peter might want to comment on the State's
>> attitude regarding "free" vs paid for software use in education. How
>> does VT stand on "breaking the rules" software wise? Someone has to
>> set the standard/lay down the rules. A "position paper" on software
>> use/licences would be valuable to the troops who might have to
>> confront administration with potential "true costs" in terms of tech
>> infrastructure."
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> This e-mail may contain information protected under the Family Educational
>> Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). If this e-mail contains student
> information
>> and you are not entitled to access such information under FERPA, please
> notify
>> the sender. Federal regulations require that you destroy this e-mail
> without
>> reviewing it and you may not forward it to anyone.
>>
>>>>> Bryan Thompson <[log in to unmask]> 11/29/2009 6:16 PM >>>
>> This is education and
>> dare I say, especially now, cutting corners might be defensible.
>> I would suggest that Peter might want to comment on the State's
>> attitude regarding "free" vs paid for software use in education. How
>> does VT stand on "breaking the rules" software wise? Someone has to
>> set the standard/lay down the rules. A "position paper" on software
>> use/licences would be valuable to the troops who might have to
>> confront administration with potential "true costs" in terms of tech
>> infrastructure.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
> and privileged information protected under the Family Educational Rights and
> Privacy Act. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
> prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender
> by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the message.
>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information protected under the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender
by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the message.
|