LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for USDEBATE Archives


USDEBATE Archives

USDEBATE Archives


USDEBATE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

USDEBATE Home

USDEBATE Home

USDEBATE  March 2010

USDEBATE March 2010

Subject:

USU 2011 Bid Disclosure

From:

Alfred C Snider <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

USA Debating in the WUDC Format <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:48:56 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (84 lines)

From 
http://debate.uvm.edu/debateblog/usu2011/USU_11_Blog/Entries/2010/3/31_THOUGHTS_ABOUT_USU_PROCEDURE.html

John Meany of Claremont has raised some interesting issues, and as 
convener of a potential USU 2011 at the University of Vermont I wanted 
to reply.

1. Titles:

   * Convener - run the logistics of the tournament. If it is on his or
     her campus they are ultimately responsible for the tournament.
   * CA - coordinate motion writing, plan and implement judge and
     debater training, tabulate judge feedback. Guidelines for motion
     writing will be made available.
   * DCA - assist in these efforts of the CA
   * Tab - record ballots, input judge rankings from CA/DCA based on
     training test and feedback form, allow computer to pair the round.
   * Equity officer - hear complaints from any participant. Need not be
     a woman. Convene informal investigation and offer informal 
suggestion of a
     resolution of a problem to the convener, who should then be
     involved because it is probably his or her institution that is
     hosting. Such decisions will be made in concert with host
     institution. We will gain guidance from our university legal
     offices before the tournament and have a representative of that
     office on call. Standards for conduct need to be stated publicly
     in advance.

2. Manual changes to the pairings: will not be done except in extreme 
circumstances. The judge ratings are put into the machine, and the 
machine assigns judges. Changes may be made when:

   * Judge needs to be replaced for reason of illness, etc.
   * Judge informs tab of a serious conflict that should have been
     reported earlier.
   * Extreme situation, judge and one of the debaters in a situation
      and would rather not now judge.
   * Bizarre and highly unusual situation I cannot imagine at this time
   * NEVER in an effort to make a "better" or "more balanced" panel.
     There is too much potential for abuse. Always keep a record of such 
changes.

3. Transparency: have the tab area in an open and available space 
depending on room availability. For example, we would not have USU tab 
in the room where everyone is hanging out because of noise, but it 
should be in an open identified space so people can drop in for the 
purposes of transparency and helping people understand how the 
tournament is tabulated. Frankly, if we have 120+ teams at USU 2011 
there is no room that can house both debaters and judges in the same spot.

4. I believe in open adjudication for all rounds. As convener I will try 
and persuade others helping me run the event that this should be so. In 
all of our regional events we have had open adjudication and none of us 
have been able to see any negative effects.

5. Judge training. We think that documents about judging should be made 
available before the tournament, we believe there should be an online 
judge test before the tournament (to allow timely examination of the 
results). We would look at the way the decision is explained as much if 
not more than the decision that is reached. There should also be format 
information made available to participants beforehand. We do believe in 
using feedback forms, because we think debaters deserve to have a say. 
Someone may make a good decision but give lousy feedback, and we want 
debaters to be able to comment on this because their learning is at stake.

Thanks to John for raising these issues, and I think all of them are 
good ones. I know that John believes we should not form an organization 
(USUDA) but then that would be one way to put standards to work. On the 
other hand, those bidding can be public about things so voters can know 
what they are choosing. This is why we are doing this now.

Thanks, and we hope you will support our bid.

-- 
Alfred C. Snider aka Tuna
Edwin Lawrence Professor of Forensics
University of Vermont
Huber House, 475 Main Street, UVM, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
Lawrence Debate Union http://debate.uvm.edu/debateblog/LDU/
Global Debate Blog http://globaldebateblog.blogspot.com
Debate Central http://debate.uvm.edu
802-656-0097 office telephone
802-656-4275 office fax

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2022
January 2022
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
May 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
December 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager