I think of how hard we have all tried to promote our material. I think
it has taken years to do. Look in CINAHL, Index Medicus, pubmed; OVID,
SilverPlatter, Clin-e-guide, full text; look on the Library shared pages
on the intranet; EBM databases; etc. It has taken us a long time to get
here. --I truly hope that print is not dead. I know it is going to new
formats!!! New challengers and new directions--I think and know I will
learn!! I might be slow, but I will get there!!
I remember the first talk about www, I thought I would be lost!
Michael Wold, MLS, OSF St. Mary Medical Center, Galesburg, Il.

-----Original Message-----
From: Medical Libraries Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Mina Davenport
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Print is dead and

That was really something, someone really had to think that through to
get it to work. I was outraged - of course! - until it had played about
half. I still think a lot of this Web 2.0 and multimedia stuff is
overhyped and overdone, but "Print is dead" sure gives me something to
think about...

Thanks for sharing this Laurel.

Mina

Mina Davenport, Librarian
Childrens Hospital 
Health Sciences Library
747 52nd Street
Oakland CA 94609  USA
(510) 428-3448 (p)
(510) 601-3963 (f)
[log in to unmask]


==============================================================================
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this message by anyone other than the addressee is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, or an agent of the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original e-mail, attachment(s), and any copies.
==============================================================================