Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - UVMFLOWNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

UVMFLOWNET Archives

May 2010

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
UVMFLOWNET Home UVMFLOWNET Home
UVMFLOWNET May 2010

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Fraudulent Claims
From:
Phil White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 May 2010 16:25:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Dear FLO-

Can anyone help me with specific rules regarding the responsibility of a
vascular technologist to make sure inappropriate exams are not billed to
Medicare or other insurers?  

Specifically, the ED department has stated and that they will order a Venous
study on everyone who comes to the ED with a leg or toe complaint, so they
do not miss a DVT.  This has been in effect for quite some time and the
increase in venous studies have doubled.  We have all experienced how
frustrating it is to be called in for silly stuff but now it kick up to a
new level.

I feel this is entering into the bizarre world and there is no end to it
except to explain to them this is fraudulent.

Thanks

Phil White BS RVT

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV