UVMFLOWNET Archives

May 2010

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 May 2010 10:17:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
For us, complete study, means complete study, we interrogate the entire 
vessel as long as we can see it, just because be see an ostial stenosis we 
don't stop there, as there may also be stenosis in the mid or distal portion of 
the vessel, it would be a shame if the interventionalist opened the proximal 
artery and missed a more distal lesion.

BW

On Wed, 5 May 2010 21:07:37 -0500, Norman Paley <[log in to unmask]> 
wrote:

>After a conversation that I had today with a general ultrasound technologist 
I have a question.  Does anybody here who does renal artery Doppler studies 
consider the study for that kidney completed and stop upon determining that 
the renal/aortic ratio is > 3.5, or, do you continue and try to get all of the 
additional data and views that are generally obtained in a complete renal 
artery study?  Thank you for any response.
>
>Norman Paley, BS, RVT
>Technical Director Vascular Laboratory
>Richmond University Medical Center
>Staten Island, New York
>
>To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
>http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2