Stuart Newman wrote:
> An interview with the Columbia military technology analyst Christopher
> Brownfield in yesterday's NYT describes a proposal to use a conventional (i.e.
> non-nuclear) detonation to seal the well:
this is a NY Times article with near ZERO content regarding closing off
this well with a conventional explosive. unless you are aware of some
longer version of this interview where he discussed HOW such a
conventional explosion could seal the well given the known issues at the
wellhead and below, its hard to understand what relevance this has to us.