LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ISOGEOCHEM Archives


ISOGEOCHEM Archives

ISOGEOCHEM Archives


ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ISOGEOCHEM Home

ISOGEOCHEM Home

ISOGEOCHEM  July 2010

ISOGEOCHEM July 2010

Subject:

Re: 25*C and SI in concrete

From:

Pier de Groot <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:45:54 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (319 lines)

Hi Wolfram,

You did understand wrongly I think. Of course we can react at other
temperatures, but than we require to know the isotopic fractionations of the
specific carbonate by the specific temperature (e.g. obtained by
experimental methods, there are some fractionations at different
temperatures reported in literature, one example already given in my former
posting: Rosenbaum and Sheppard, GCA, 1986, 50: 1147-1150; they did
experiments on higher reaction temperatures and reported the isotopic
fractionation factors of some 'resistive' carbonates, such as dolomite,
siderite and ankerite), and the temperature should be well controlled (the
lower the reaction temperature the more critical this is because of increase
in fractionation factor vs. decrease of T).

I prefer to use the proper isotopic fractionation factor instead of
calculation, more error is introduced by a calculation method, and still we
require to know the different isotopic fractionations: of the applied
digestion temperature and the 25°C digestion.
In case of proper isotopic fractionations are applied we do not require 'to
report to 25°C', since the proper isotopic value is produced if using the
proper isotopic fractionation factor - the temperature of digestion actually
is of no importance except for knowing the correct fractionation factor at
that specific T, all only true if we calibrate our system accordingly by
digestion of our standards at the same conditions as the samples.
The proper isotopic fractionation (at the applied T) is of importance!
We obtain the isotopic value directly calibrated to our standards (also
digested at the same temperature as the samples, of course, as stated above)
and we do not require any extra step of calculation which will introduce
more error.
What is mixed up here is that the calibration of the carbonate system was
defined by 25°C digestion (on calcite!), and still forms the basis of our
systematics. It does not imply we have to recalculate all our samples to a
25°C digestion situation, however. If using the correct fractionation
factor, at any temperature applied, and as long as the standards are
digested at the same conditions (means a proper calibration), we do a proper
job.

Willi's remarks about mixtures of carbonates basically can be found
published during the 1960's and 1970's where several methods how to handle
acid digestion of mixtures of carbonates were described (see also my review
on acid digestion, including mixtures of carbonates, and also digesting
carbonates at temperatures other than 25°C in my handbook Vol. 2, chapter
4-5 and references therein). Actually there are other factors of importance
with the acid digestion than just the temperature, such as density of the
phosphoric acid (should be between 1.90 to 1.92, sometimes called '103%
acid') and grainsize of the sample to be digested, to name some.
For instance, if we have a mixture of calcite and dolomite, we can apply a
'time-separated' method. We load the mixture in a usually used container for
acid digestion of carbonates and start digestion (at 25°C). After a time
period of one to two hours we will have released as good as all CO2 from the
calcite, while the dolomite stil has not reacted (dolomite reacts very
slowly at 25°C and first after ~4 hours a measurable amount of CO2 can be
detected, after experiments as reported in literature). Extract the
calcite-CO2 for measurement on the IRMS and continue reaction for at least 4
days to obtain the dolomite-CO2. Alternatively we can raise the temperature
after extraction of the calcite-CO2 and accordingly can react for shorter
time for the dolomite (and have to include the changed fractionation factor
also, of course). This was the most used procedure to my knowledge - some
other methods were also described (see my review as mentioned above).

Indeed we have to use NBS19 and LSVEC, and if wished some other standards
for quality control although not strictly required, for calibration of our
system.
But the calibration has to be 'adjusted' for the deviating temperature
digestion, either by application of the NBS19-LSVEC standards themselves at
the used T of digestion or else use of laboratory standards, calibrated to
the NBS19-LSVEC, at the applied T of digestion. Calculation is possible, but
includes more work and may introduce more error - the isotopic fractionation
factors of the digestion at the applied and the 25°C T's have to be used
anyway for the calculation, this since the isotopic fractionation is not
linear.

Why the 'good old methods' are not followed and some deviative methods which
only introduced bias had to be imported, I do not know. Best is to look what
was done before and use the good of it and only change those matters that
really require improvement. We must not try to invent the wheel again,
certainly not if the new wheel is 'less round' than the old one!

So, my posting had nothing to do with 'moaning' or anything like that. It
just is on what I brought forward to be erroneous in what was described!
I agree we have to life with non-ideal conditions and do our best to make
the good of it. Pragmatism is good as long it uses the right paths'.. And
the 'the principle-of-identical treatment' is correct, as long as that
treatment is the right one.

I hope you can agree with the comments as given above, and I did not shock
you too much with the 'old' but, what I tried to explain, correct
procedures.

Have a nice Sunday Wolfram,
Pier.

****************************************************************
Delta Isotopes Consultancy

Dr. Pier A. de Groot
De Schans 47
3945 Ham (Oostham)
Belgium
Tel. +32 (0)11 72 77 66
e-mail: [log in to unmask]


Chair of the Programme Group ³Isotopes in Geosciences² [IG] and Secretary
for IG in the ³Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Petrology, Volcanology² [GMPV]
division of the European Geoscience Union (EGU)
EGU Home web-site: http://www.egu.eu/

Scientific Committee member of BASIS (Benelux Association of Stable Isotope
Scientists).
http://www.basis-online.eu/

Visit the Elsevier WEB-site about my ³Handbook of Stable Isotope Analytical
Techniques² Vol-II (published Nov. 17, 2008):
http://www.elsevierdirect.com/product.jsp?isbn=9780444511157
and Vol-I (was published Dec. 27, 2004) at:
http://www.elsevierdirect.com/product.jsp?isbn=9780444511140

****************************************************************


> From: Wolfram Meier-Augenstein <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:53:20 +0100
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [ISOGEOCHEM] 25*C and SI in concrete
>
> Hi Pier,
>
>
> So, what do you propose people should do who happen to work with carbonates
> that are resilient to acid digest at 25 C but require higher temperatures to
> react, or, even "better", who are working with mixed carbonates where one
> (mineral) fraction reacts at 25 C but the other only just, and where 18O
> fractionation slopes will differ?
>
> I call this the normative forces and facts of life; it's no good to moan this
> should be done strictly observing condition X because of Y if the reaction
> doesn't work at condition X in the first place. One has to be pragmatic and do
> they best one can under the circumstances.
>
> As Willi pointed out already, to report 18O data to the standard temperature
> of 25 C independent of the actual temperature the digest had to be performed,
> 18O values must be back-calculated to 25 C.
>
> What this boils down to is observance of the principle-of-identical treatment,
> i.e. concurrent digest and analysis of NBS19 and LSVEC plus one or two other
> standards as quality control (for the correction).
>
>
> Best,
>
> Wolfram
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Stable Isotope Geochemistry on behalf of Pier de Groot
> Sent: Sat 24/07/2010 17:23
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ISOGEOCHEM] 25*C and SI in concrete
>
>
>
> Hi Robert and others,
>
> First my two cents for references on concrete/mortar and isotopes:
>
> Zouridakis, N. M., I. G. Economou, et al. (2000). "Investigation of the
> physicochemical characteristics of ancient mortars by static and dynamic
> studies." Cement Concrete Res. 30(7): 1151-1155 doi:
> 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00280-5.
>
> Rafai, N., R. Letolle, et al. (1992). "Carbonation-decarbonation of
> concretes studied by the way of carbon and oxygen stable isotopes." Cement
> Concrete Res. 22(5): 882-890 doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(92)90112-9.
>
> Létolle, R., P. Gégout, et al. (1992). "Stable isotopes of carbon and oxygen
> for the study of carbonation/decarbonation processes in concretes." Cement
> Concrete Res. 22(2-3): 235-240 doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(92)90061-Y.
>
> Häussler, F., F. Eichhorn, et al. (1990). "Monitoring of the hydration
> process of hardening cement pastes by small-angle neutron scattering."
> Cement Concrete Res. 20(4): 644-654 doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(90)90107-9.
>
> And maybe still of use:
> Graham, I. J., R. L. Goguel, et al. (2000). "Use of strontium isotopes to
> determine the origin of cement in concretes: Case examples from New
> Zealand." Cement Concrete Res. 30(7): 1105-1111 doi:
> 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00248-9.
>
> Than about the carbonate-isotope analytical procedure:
> Your statement that temperature can be ignored in acid digestion of
> carbonates for isotopic determinations did alarm me quite a lot, at least if
> considering oxygen isotope determinations...
> The oxygen isotopic fractionation of phosphoric acid digestion of the
> carbonates is temperature dependent* in a non-linear way to my knowledge. If
> this fractionation is not linear temperature is highly important, since if
> we calibrate our system at 25°C or 22°C (or other T's) by acid digestion
> different fractionation factors have to be used to estimate the value to
> correct/calibrate to the proper scale.
> Maybe you meant this yourself, but if so, I did not get the right picture
> the way you described things - certainly not by the statmeent on
> temperatures in your posting to the list.
>
> * Let me quote from Rosenbaum and Sheppard (GCA, 1986, 50: 1147-1150):
> "Since reaction with phosphoric acid liberates only two thirds of the oxygen
> of the carbonate as CO2 gas, a temperature dependent fractionation of oxygen
> isotopes occur."
>
> Best regards,
> Pier.
>
> ****************************************************************
> Delta Isotopes Consultancy
>
> Dr. Pier A. de Groot
> De Schans 47
> 3945 Ham (Oostham)
> Belgium
> Tel. +32 (0)11 72 77 66
> e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>
>
> Chair of the Programme Group ³Isotopes in Geosciences² [IG] and Secretary
> for IG in the ³Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Petrology, Volcanology² [GMPV]
> division of the European Geoscience Union (EGU)
> EGU Home web-site: http://www.egu.eu/
>
> Scientific Committee member of BASIS (Benelux Association of Stable Isotope
> Scientists).
> http://www.basis-online.eu/
>
> Visit the Elsevier WEB-site about my ³Handbook of Stable Isotope Analytical
> Techniques² Vol-II (published Nov. 17, 2008):
> http://www.elsevierdirect.com/product.jsp?isbn=9780444511157
> and Vol-I (was published Dec. 27, 2004) at:
> http://www.elsevierdirect.com/product.jsp?isbn=9780444511140
>
> ****************************************************************
>
>
>> From: Robert van Geldern <[log in to unmask]>
>> Reply-To: Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:11:14 +0200
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: [ISOGEOCHEM] 25*C
>>
>> Am 21.07.2010 um 06:34 schrieb A. Schauer:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> 1) How do you obtain a controlled 25*C for phosphoric acid digestion of
>>> carbonate in your lab? My lab varies around 22*C. It seems as though most
>>> water baths with heating option only control from 5*C above ambient to 99*C.
>>> Do you use a chiller model then or are you lucky enough to have a lab that
>>> is
>>> 20*C? Please either outline your method if home-built or provide a part
>>> number and manufacturer for your bath.
>>
>>> 2) How do I know that my 25*C will be the same as your 25*C?
>>
>>
>> to (2) As long as you run calibrated standards (CO-1, NBS 19 or calibrated
>> lab
>> standards) together with your at identical conditions and normalize your data
>> to the defined value (e.g. d13C for NBS 19 = +1,95 permil) absolute
>> temperature does not matter at all. The standards in our lab will be same as
>> in your lab, so temperature can be ignored. You can run your carbonates at
>> any
>> temperature you want as long as your temperature is _constant_ (in case of
>> 18O analysis) for your standards and your samples.
>>
>> to (1) since we run a gasbench with temperature stabilzed tray we never built
>> our own system. But 18O water analysis (also temperature sensitive) I was
>> happy by using a standard drying oven. We placed a styrofoam box with a tube
>> rack in the drying cabinet and set the temperature controller to 26°C.
>> However, since the acid reaction is a one way lane (instead of water
>> equilibration) you have to be fast by injecting you acid. Otherwise your
>> vials
>> will cool down after taking it out of the oven... :-)
>>
>>
>> regards,
>> Robert
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> SCRI, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA.
> The Scottish Crop Research Institute is a charitable company limited by
> guarantee.
> Registered in Scotland No: SC 29367.
> Recognised by the Inland Revenue as a Scottish Charity No: SC 006662.
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This email is from the Scottish Crop Research Institute, but the views
> expressed by the sender are not necessarily the views of SCRI and its
> subsidiaries. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
> to the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been
> addressed. It may not be disclosed or used by any other than that addressee.
> If you are not the intended recipient you are requested to preserve this
> confidentiality and you must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this
> e-mail in any way. Please notify [log in to unmask] quoting the name of the
> sender and delete the email from your system.
>
> Although SCRI has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are
> present in this email, neither the Institute nor the sender accepts any
> responsibility for any viruses, and it is your responsibility to scan the
> email and the attachments (if any).
> ______________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager