UVMFLOWNET Archives

July 2010

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Torniquet use with fistula mapping.
From:
Brian Wirick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Jul 2010 14:16:31 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
Interesting that this shows up. I've been doing mappings for a certain surgeon 
for a while and his fistula's have been turning out fine and I image without a 
tourniquet.
Now he tells me he wants a tourniquet every time I do a mapping. I guess 
protocols change...But if the vein is a good size to begin with, is a tourniquet 
really needed?

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2