Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jul 2010 16:02:43 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you for your information. I have a few questions also: Was vasospasm
an explanation for vein going from adequate to too small? What was the
definition/criteria for a successful fistula? Also it would seem, from your data,
that the application tourniquet will almost certainly result in an adequate vein
diameter--with the exception of the tourniquet causing a adequate vein
change to too small. I have been through those sites on several occasions but
have yet to locate a fistula use torniquet policy that addresses the extended
tourniquet times. You mentioned Robbin, who is that? Once agian thank you--
it was helpful info.
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:53:04 -0400, Courtney Crawford
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I presented the SVU paper...here's a brief summary:
>
>We reviewed about two years of vein mappings with and without tourniquet.
>At our site, the surgeons have established 0.30cm as the minimum for
>adequate vein diameter. Looking at 665 veins, we found some veins went
>from being too small to adequate (9%) and some veins went from adequate
to
>too small (4%).
>
>On average, tourniquet applied to the upper arm with patient supine only
>makes a difference of 1mm (.01cm) in the forearm and 2mm (.02cm) in the
>upper arm.
>
>We were able to follow up on 111 patients. Those with fistulas created with
>dilation of vein to adequate diameter with tourniquet had a success rate of
>35%, while patients who had veins big enough without tourniquet had a
>success rate of 65%.
>
>We concluded that tourniquet may lead to more autogenous fistula creation,
>however those fistulas have higher failure rates than patients with veins of
>similar diameter without tourniquet.
>
>Joe, I believe you were looking for references regarding tourniquet use:
>Robbin has written a couple papers on the topic, but other than that I had
>trouble finding hardcore data other than a generic statement that tourniquet
>should be used. I think we've done it because that's the way it's always
been
>done.
>For protocol, try svunet http://www.svunet.org/files/positions/0809-upper-
>extrem-vein-map.pdf
>Here's a launching point for papers regarding vein maps:
>http://www.fistulafirst.org/Archives/ArchiveCC3.aspx
>Good luck!
>
>To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
>http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
|
|
|