UVMFLOWNET Archives

July 2010

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 5 Jul 2010 23:56:32 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
It would seem that the tourniquet will put a small vein/graft patient into a 2.5 mm vein/ fistula patient category. Fistulas are preferable but if we know a tourniquet will get them to a fistula what  is the value of the tourniquet  vs the risk of patient injury?

------Original Message------
From: Brian Wirick
Sender: UVM Flownet
To: [log in to unmask]
ReplyTo: UVM Flownet
Subject: Re: Torniquet use with fistula mapping.
Sent: Jul 5, 2010 12:16 PM

Interesting that this shows up. I've been doing mappings for a certain surgeon 
for a while and his fistula's have been turning out fine and I image without a 
tourniquet.
Now he tells me he wants a tourniquet every time I do a mapping. I guess 
protocols change...But if the vein is a good size to begin with, is a tourniquet 
really needed?

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html


Sent from JDSBB

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2