Thanks for explaining this. I totally understand the emergency need
(sometimes it genuinely is us or them). It sounded in your previous
post like that was your method of choice for dealing with them, and I'm
glad to learn it is not.
I deeply admire your commitment, which is what puzzled me.
On 2/1/2013 11:48 AM, Thomas Berriman wrote:
> Subject: birds and cats
> Date: Thu Jan 31 2013 16:31 pm
> From: jeshawks AT shoreham.net
> Thomas, given the really impressive background you just spelled out, I
> wonder if you might explain something in your previous post that
> disturbed me and some other readers far more than throwing stuff at
> intruding cats, and that's your method of choice for killing mice, glue
> traps and drowning.
> I assume there's a reason you do it this way. I've struggled against
> the necessity of killing mice and found no way around it, but I settled
> on snap traps because they kill quickly and reasonably humanely. Are
> those impractical for you in some way?
> Hi Jane
> Glue traps are not my first choice in dealing with mice but sometimes that is the only thing that works if Snap traps have failed. A few years ago a mouse was eating the wiring in the walls of my house (this can cause fire and loss of human life) After it somehow avoided death in a snap trap I was left with having to use any method that worked. The end result once the mouse is lodged in the glue is either smacking the mouse with a hammer or dropping him into a bucket of water.
> When we think about humane killing (there's an interesting concept) I guess every species would like it to be swift and painless. That doesn't always happen in the natural world. But you are right that given the choice most of the time I would use a snap trap or a 'havaheart' trap which may or may not work 100% of the time. So much depends upon the circumatances.
> Still given what is humane and inhumane (and every person has their own concept or guidelines for how they define that) Many, many people 'love' animals as I do yet when I ask them what animal they cooked for their family dinner last night or what can of processed animal food they opened and fed their pet cat or dog today, what they really mean is I love my pet even if it means several other animal species must be .....what humanly harvested.
> I understand this surprisingly, My choice is 99% of the time to try to do no harm. I have found in 20 years I get along quite well without having to 'harvest ' many of those other species.