LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  November 2013

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE November 2013

Subject:

Re: [radcaucus] business for the rad caucus

From:

"Romsted, Laurence" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:30:15 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (377 lines)

Carol:

Seems like this should be discussed at the SftP conference in April.
Scientists are workers too.

Larry

On 11/24/13 4:30 PM, "Carrol Cox" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>The post below was sent two months ago to the list of the Radical Caucus
>(MLA). Along with the posts quoted, it provides an excellent snap shot, it
>seems  to me, of the condition of college labor today and, by extension,
>the
>condition of higher education in the U.S. Today and also of K-12
>education,
>and by yet further extension, of the condition of the working classes of
>the
>day in this Age of Austerity, Repression, & Endless Wars.
>
>There exist radical or left caucuses in a number of academic disciplines;
>should not all such caucuses begin to consider the possibility of a
>national
>"caucus" of some sort involving all campus labor (and not just faculty);
>not
>a union (though that is needed) but focused on creating a channel for
>information exchange among activist groups on various campuses and,
>eventually, shared action.
>
>Carrol
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>Behalf Of Richard Ohmann
>Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:01 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [radcaucus] business for the rad caucus
>
>Your dystopian imagination is terrific, Betsy.  Having tried and failed to
>find some leverage on this issue for 4 years (on the MLA executive
>council),
>I'm inclined to agree that the adjunct problem will become the new normal,
>in something like the way you posit, plus the outsourcing of grading and
>correcting to Bangladesh, etc.  This will not be a great development for
>the
>tenure track faculty, some of whom will be needed to keep Stanford, MIT,
>and
>Princeton at the top of the elite heap, and to star for MOOCs; but many of
>whom will themselves become supernumeraries.  Unless . . . .
>
>d
>
>On Sep 18, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Margaret Hanzimanolis wrote:
>
>
>	Thank you for your comments, Kamala, Carol, and Rich.
>
>	Part time faculty make up 50.1 % of the instructional staff in US
>colleges and Universities.  They receive about 1/3 the pay, 1/10 of the
>benefits, and  have no academic freedoms and weak or missing job security.
>A lifetime of adjunct work (I am a lifer) yields a loss of roughly 1
>million
>dollars (were equal pay for equal work the rule).  Since there are 761,990
>PTF (and 761,660 FTF) , that means the students, the institution, the
>taxpayer save about 33 billion a year on PTF labor--if you run that out to
>wealth statistics, which find women way behind men (78-100 in pay
>differential--but  men's lifetime earnings are 400% higher ) .. So the
>same
>for African Americans, whose hourly pay lags 40 cents, but whose lifetime
>earnings lag 8000%, (for women).  When we come to adjuncts, we have a 60
>cent wage differential, which presumably amounts to about a 12,000 %
>lifetime wealth loss.
>
>	We are really talking about trillions of dollars.  IN addition, FTF
>have much more admin work, many more pressures, so you, as an emeritus,
>Rich,  lived perhaps in the only golden era (1970-1985) for higher
>education! --if we ever had one.   I think the structural inequities in
>treatment of PTF labor nationally is way, way above (in importance) the
>issue of concessions from unions. but locally that might well be the
>battle.
>
>
>	But the time is past, I think, for useful PTf resistance ( I can't
>really explain why this is so--maybe I am just tiring out on it>)--but now
>that I have spent a couple months tracking how Lumina is controlling the
>curriculum, controlling the accreditation, controlling the HE media (with
>student loan profits of its parent corp:) , I am feeling like the adjunct
>problem is actually not going to be a problem very soon, as the colleges
>and
>universities have been herded into common standards, and other
>standardizing
>practices in the curriculum, which will mean that a 'ready made"
>curriculum
>can be foisted upon resource starved institutions, and the teachers in all
>but the most elite schools will be relegated to para-professionals
>monitoring classrooms with big screens.  In that sorry narrative, the
>adjunct question will have disappeared, because corporations will be
>desiging and selling all variety of canned curriculum which will, da da,:
>match the canned standards that colleges and universities have been forced
>to adopt. 
>
>	 I give it 15  years and there will be no adjunct problem: everyone
>will be an adjunct except for the 15%-30% elites--who will always have
>first
>rate, F2F education.  I don't know where the line will be drawn between
>the
>live curriculum and the canned:  maybe 40% will get the living education,
>and 60% the dead and canned.  Not sure exactly how it will be staged in...
>but in that scenario  the  761,000 FTF cohort will be about right... then
>the others--those currently on the adjunct track-- will not be teachers,
>actually,  they will be "classroom monitors" --a kind of glorified
>paraprofessional, not functioning as "instructional"personnel--but rather
>"support."  They will need only a AA in "instructional technology
>management" a degree that does not exist yet, but will in about two years.
>Tutors, educated in the field, will be available (as freelancers) to the
>well off non elite should a student have the means and wish some face to
>face tutoring.  The school will simply provide "space" --drafty halls with
>banging shutters and burned out lightbulbs where these freelancers conduct
>their tutoring.  The institution will not "pay" the tutor, instead, the
>tutor will collect her tutoring fees individually, from each  student ,
>and
>do her own photocopying on her own dime or whatever else is needed --
>spend
>a few hours boning  up on British romanticism so she can  customize a
>tutoring session for an especially generous (or promising?) student .
>It's
>really more like a brothel idea with the institution  pimping out the
>tutor
>(formerly the adjunct), collecting a fee from the tutor for being
>"referred"
>to students needing F2F (like how many hair salons are run--you rent a
>"booth"),  providing space.  Hey maybe this is a movie.
>
>	I hope this is just my own personal nightmare .  But the foundation
>control of everything in education goes really quite deep.  The final
>straw
>for me was when I discovered how far  the accrediting take-over has
>progressed already, by these "foundations" that are flush with grotesque
>profits from yesteryear, and intent upon developing new "monetizing"
>opportunities.  The ambitions and goals are quite naked: Privatization of
>sectors, services, curriculum, testing, instructional materials,
>everything.
>
>
>	I hope I am wrong.
>
>
>	On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Rich Gibson <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:
>	
>
>		Having been a full prof, then emeritus, and now an
>adjunct---for fun---it's pretty easy to see how people are being played,
>not
>only by their bosses, but by their union(s) and by themselves.
>		
>		Having been an organizer for the empire's unions, on the
>road, for about 1/2 my life, I know how the unions play too.
>		
>		And no one working for any of the teacher/prof/schoolworker
>unions wants much of anything to do with faculty in colleges and
>universities.
>		
>		Why? Individualism, arrogance, hubris, racism, opportunism,
>nationalism, and sheer stupidity. It is much, much, easier to organize,
>and
>then trick if necessary, k12 workers. And the k12 world draws a lot more
>dues.
>		
>		On my campus, the union (an NEA affiliate) which represents
>full time and adjunct profs in the same unit (custodial staff in another
>union, secretaries in another---US unions divide people more than unite
>them) negotiated a 5% pay cut, concessions, after the bosses had taken a
>5%
>raise (bosses then took a 3% cut and promoted that as sacrifice).
>		
>		The union then said concessions would save jobs--when any
>idiot should know concessions do not save jobs but like giving blood to a
>shark, makes bosses want more. Labor history since around 1970 shows that
>as
>a fact.
>		
>		The day after the contract was ratified, one of the union's
>chief bargainers became a dean and about 700 classes were cut, meaning a
>few
>adjuncts I know lost their homes. It was an utterly corrupt and dishonest
>deal, promoted effectively by elected leaders and very well paid NEA staff
>(among others, those who helped destroy the Occupy and anti-tuition
>movements, for Obama).
>		
>		But faculty cannot bring themselves to say: corrupt and
>dishonest. Why? The treacle that passes off for collegiality and
>tolerance.
>		
>		When I informed the union bosses they should declare that
>employees and bosses have contradictory interests (they like partner in
>production bargaining and most of the faculty did too) and that they
>should
>organize a committee which united the faculty, other staff, and students
>(they being the target of schools, their minds and bodies) working easily
>beyond the bounds of the restrictive union contract (labor peace sold for
>dues) , set up a multiple area bargaining organization to create
>bargaining
>minimums that must be met, and plan state wide job actions (maybe 200 ccs
>in
>CA?), my union bosses went to the campus police complaining that I was a
>terrorist.
>		
>		Fortunately, the police rejected that claim, as did human
>resources (knees shot, I can't terrorize anyone anymore) .
>		
>		But the union is, I think, about to propose another
>concession package and, having done nothing to organize anyone for the
>last
>year, it may well be passed.
>		
>		"a fight extending well beyond the academy" is right on.
>		
>		Everything is in place for a dramatic change in the empire's
>corporate state : distrust of govt and capital, some dissent in the
>military
>(2/3 of those polled opposed the Syria attack--that is new) and a Lot of
>anger among vets, etc.
>		
>		Of course, the array of enemies, physical and ideological,
>is vast.
>		
>		The core issue of our time is the reality of the promise of
>perpetual imperialist war and booming inequality met by the potential of
>mass, integrated, class conscious resistance.
>		
>		But, with such small numbers on the radical or revolutionary
>left: where to begin--outside and inside the academy? Who are the prime
>canaries in the mine that will actually do something, put their bodies out
>there? Soldiers. Vets. Students. Immigrants. Dedicated anti-racists of all
>kinds.
>		
>		I really like and respect the adjuncts who, like me, work so
>hard for so little (I have other earned income and don't have to worry too
>much at the moment). But I do not think they would be first in my line as
>an
>organizer.
>		
>		I'd be very interested in what others say about that. I've
>not been an adjunct long and have some to learn.
>		
>		best,
>		
>		r
>
>
>
>
>
>		On 9/18/2013 3:32 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
>		
>
>			Kamala Platt Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:22 PM
>business for the rad
>			caucus
>			
>			The way I see it, adjuncts are "canaries in the
>mine" for many academic
>			issues. If people paid attn. to more of the
>abuse/exploitation against
>			contingent faculty, more things would get nipped in
>the bud/butt...
>			-----------
>			
>			Probably not, at least not without lengthy struggle,
>extending well beyond
>			the academy --for you are absolutely correct in
>seeing this issue in a wider
>			context when you go on to write:
>			
>			"That said, I think  academics of all persuasions
>might do well to note how
>			closely adjunct struggles
>			resonate with other temporary and part time workers
>and workers outside of
>			protective legislation in US.
>			Lets not remain in the Ivory Tower and those on the
>fringes/ borders of
>			academia may connect most with
>			the "real world" I realize if we are talking about
>resolutions, we need to
>			focus on academia, but we can
>			utilize that argument to bring along issues in
>tandem, in other places."
>			
>			Not just with :" other temporary and part time
>workers" however but with the
>			entire work force, including retired workers, and
>not just the U.S. but
>			globally. And this is why I responded as I did to
>your first sentence. (I
>			would suggest that an excellent empirical account of
>current global
>			actuality is to be found in _Our Mutual Friend_ and
>_Little Doritt_ -- more
>			accurate than the NYT at least on the day's events.)
>			
>			Capital is still triumphing in the great war that
>began with Carter's
>			appointment of Volcker & his implicit approval of
>the murder of Bishop
>			Romano.
>			
>			Carrol
>			
>			
>			
>			
>			
>
>
>		-- 
>		You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>Google Groups "Radical Caucus of the MLA" group.
>		To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>from it, send an email to [log in to unmask]
><mailto:[log in to unmask]> .
>		To post to this group, send email to
>[log in to unmask]
>		Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/radcaucus
><http://groups.google.com/group/radcaucus> .
>		For more options, visit
>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
><https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out> .
>		
>
>
>
>
>	-- 
>	
>
>	******************************
>	Margaret Hanzimanolis, MFA, Ph.D.
>	415-516-7949
>	
>	Southern African Travel Narratives
>	http://hanzer.blogspot.com
>	
>	City College of San Francisco
>	[log in to unmask]
>
>	De Anza College, FHDACCD
>	Cupertino, CA
>	[log in to unmask]
>	
>	Caņada College, SMCCD
>	Redwood City, CA
>	hanzimanolism@ <mailto:[log in to unmask]> smccd.edu
>
>
>	<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
>	-- 
>	You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Radical Caucus of the MLA" group.
>	To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an email to [log in to unmask]
>	To post to this group, send email to [log in to unmask]
>	Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/radcaucus.
>	For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>	
>
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>"Radical Caucus of the MLA" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>email to [log in to unmask]
>To post to this group, send email to [log in to unmask]
>Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/radcaucus.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager