UVMFLOWNET Archives

September 2014

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Cuzzilla <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 04:44:43 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Hi everyone,
Does anyone have any experience with this unit?  I have been trialling one for a few weeks and love everything about its performance and compactness but have one concern.  On several occasions I have obtained what I would consider abnormally high toe PPG pressures (anywhere between 120-140 mmHg) in patients with varying levels/amounts of large vessel disease documented on duplex.  I always used Parkes units previously and never observed similarly high PPG pressures with anywhere near the same regularity. I can only assume that there might be an issue with this demo unit.  Any advice on this and Hadeco in general would be much appreciated.

Regards,
Michael Cuzzilla
Technical Director

Kuring-Gai Vascular Ultrasound
Suite G06
Ground Floor
10 Edgeworth David Avenue
HORNSBY NSW 2077 Australia
P +61 2 9477 7177 F +61 2 9477 6238
E [log in to unmask] W kvu.com.au

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2