Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:22:48 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
With apologies ...
The answer is, of course, it depends ... need a bit more of a fact pattern
in order to separate those qualifying as G0365 (pre-fistula on a virgin arm
- bilateral would require the use of a modifier &, arguably, documentation
of medical necessity - conditional orders are useful), versus 93970 versus
93971 versus 93930 versus 93931 versus physiologic testing (e.g., 93923).
Protocols are useful (e.g., define complete vs limited, etc.) ...
All the best,
/fww
-----Original Message-----
From: UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Betty-Sue/Elizabeth
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2014 3:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: fistula mapping
Less than exciting but you all could maybe be helpful to me again. I work
in general sonography ( we do all the usual-DVT, Art physiologic, carotids)
and we are getting more that a few requests for " BUE, fistula mapping
protocol" and of course we don't have one. Please tell me what's important
and why ( the evelyn wood version would help) and maybe a few protocol hints
and billing #. thanks so much Elizabeth MI/RDMS
To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
|
|
|