Perhaps "Democracy for Science"
Perhaps not. Perhaps the solution will merely be an awareness.
At least the context of the problem on the table.
Science for the People, People¹s Science, Science for the 99%, etc.
On 8/13/15, 11:13 PM, "Science for the People Discussion List on behalf of
Jim West" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I agree with Sam and Charles.
>If only Charles' position could be reduced a few words.
>Presently we have "Science", which many think implies knowledge from an
>elite class providing pure results, and leading to arguments using terms
>like "Science denialists", "Science haters", etc.