I'm hoping to maintain an awareness of what goes on before any science has a "result" which we then take as a laborious mission to critique.
Hopefully, a small change in terminology within the draft would suffice, to reduce the sense of "Science" as an abstract result-producing entity, whose results are the main problem, and point of criticism.
it might be more effective to abort an evil science result in its early seminal or fetal stage.
In that vein, should we also include with COI underlying assumptions and intentions?
By the way, the "science" in that sentence was from the original draft.