Virologists rarely if ever run toxicological controls, despite super-obvious toxicological causation possibilities -- and thus the term "virus" is super moot, likely just a cover story for air pollution in the case of coronavirus, etc.
https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2019/04/measlesbrklyn.html#novir
Correct?
:)
Jim West
-------------------
Mitchel, this part is not true:
If PCR was run for many more cycles it is likely that everyone would be positive.
Not least because every expt should have a control. If every known negative sample (the controls) tested positive then obviously the method would be invalid.
That doesnt mean people always do run controls but they should
J
On Mar 12, 2020, at 8:23 AM, Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
If PCR was run for many more cycles it is likely that everyone would be positive.
Jonathan Latham, PhD
Executive Director
The Bioscience Resource Project,
Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[...]
|
