Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MEDLIB-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MEDLIB-L Archives

March 1996, Week 1

MEDLIB-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MEDLIB-L Home MEDLIB-L Home
MEDLIB-L March 1996, Week 1

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: CHAT biblio-obesity
From:
"Leila M. Hover" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Medical Libraries Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Mar 1996 15:24:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On Mon, 4 Mar 1996, Michael Rissinger wrote:
 
> Most of us I suspect endorse the maxim, "The heavier the book, the less the
> use."  In an article in the latest issue of the ANNALS OF IMPROBABLE
> RESEARCH, Erika Love tests our rule and finds reality not quit as we
> suspected.  She discovers the Harrison limit (10 lbs.) and describes how it
> affects use.
 
This reminded me of when I was still in a hospital setting & had one lib
committee member who would always heft a possible acquisition (which was
generally heavier than his brain, even if the tome was *small*).  I
finally grew so aggravated with this man that I blurted out "Do you judge
the worth of the book by its weight?"  Glad I don't have THAT to contend
with anymore--I have differnet things to contend with that are just as
much a pain!
 
Lee Hover
Information Developers
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV