UVMFLOWNET Archives

November 1996

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
from mailhub.hitchcock.org (MAILHUB.HITCHCOCK.ORG [130.189.240.100]) by list.uvm.edu (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with SMTP id JAA16740 for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 09:08:48 -0500 (EST) from mailbox1.Hitchcock.ORG (MAILBOX1.HITCHCOCK.ORG [130.189.240.110]) by mailhub.hitchcock.org (8.6.12-DND/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA25492 for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 09:13:33 -0500
Subject:
Re: flow volumes
Message-id:
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
06 Nov 96 09:13:32 EST
TO:
[log in to unmask]
From:
[log in to unmask] (Jeffrey P. Field)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
When using volume flows, I think that is is important to draw a distinction
between being able to accurately measure absolute flow  and being able
reproducibly obtain a flow value, even if somewhat inaccurate in absolute
terms. It is the reproducibility that will allow you to see an interval change
in volume flow which, I think, is what we are really looking for most of the
time. 
Jeff

ATOM RSS1 RSS2