SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

February 1999

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Val Dusek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:13:04 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
I am no epidemiologist, but I have read that the American origin of syphilis
has been questioned.  There were even reports of an ancient fossil in Greece
with syphilis.  I don't know how valid that claim was.  There was an article
in Monthly Review (in the 1970s, I believe, questioning the American origin of
syph on historical grounds)

In solidarity,

Val Dusek

In a message dated 2/3/99 9:24:46 AM EST, [log in to unmask] writes:

> Syphilis
>  evolved in the new world, creating great havoc in Europe after the invasion
> of
>  America. Small Pox first emerged in the old world. New influenza strains
>  regularly emerge in Asia. If we object to the African origin of HIV on
>  political grounds we are implying that a population which is first infected
>  with a virus is somehow to blame for it. Even if you accept this absurdity
> at
>  least take it all the way. If Africans are to blame for HIV, then Native
>  Americans are to blame for syphilis, Europeans for small pox, and Asians
for
>  influenza. Pretty soon you would realize that there is plenty of blame to
go
>  around.
>
>          -Corey Hardin

ATOM RSS1 RSS2