Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - UVMFLOWNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

UVMFLOWNET Archives

September 1999

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
UVMFLOWNET Home UVMFLOWNET Home
UVMFLOWNET September 1999

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Carotid stenosis.
From:
Carles Nicolau Molina <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Sep 1999 23:16:24 +-200
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
        Hello Flownetters,

I would like to request some advice on the evaluation of carotid stenosis.
In our Hospital we measure stenosis by ultrasound comparing the diameter of the lumen with the diameter of the vessel at the point of maximum stenosis (real stenosis), but correlation  with the results of arteriography is sometimes poor because they compare the diameter of the lumen with the distal diameter of the carotid. 
Do you think that we must do the same by ultrasound?

Carlos Nicolau

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV