UVMFLOWNET Archives

September 1999

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David DelPizzo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Sep 1999 15:55:03 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
IS THERE SPECTRAL DOPPLER INVOLVED IN THIS????????????
I DON'T FIND THE POOR CORRELATIONS A SURPRISE WITHOUT SOME SORT OF VELOCITY
CRITERIA FOR STENOSES.


At 03:16 AM 9/5/99 +0000, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>        Hello Flownetters,
>
>I would like to request some advice on the evaluation of carotid stenosis.
>In our Hospital we measure stenosis by ultrasound comparing the diameter
of the
>lumen with the diameter of the vessel at the point of maximum stenosis (real
>stenosis), but correlation  with the results of arteriography is sometimes
poor
>because they compare the diameter of the lumen with the distal diameter of
the
>carotid.
>Do you think that we must do the same by ultrasound?
>
>Carlos Nicolau
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2