Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - UVMFLOWNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

UVMFLOWNET Archives

September 1999

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
UVMFLOWNET Home UVMFLOWNET Home
UVMFLOWNET September 1999

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: angio-seal
From:
"Michael D. Ingegno, M.D. (R.V.T.)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Sep 1999 00:31:23 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
I've operated on two of these to remove the intraluminal device. My partner
has also operated on two patients as well.  BTW the vasoseal isn't much
better, I just operated on someone for severe ischemia of the leg who had an
intraluminal collagen plug occluding the profunda.
I've no enthusiasm for these devices, they save time because noone has to
hold pressure, but at the cost of operations on a number of patients.
Just use as small a sheath as possible and hold pressure after removal.
Perhaps there'll be a few PSAs but these rarely need operation, and don't
threaten the leg.
My $0.02

Mike Ingegno, M.D., RVT
Miami Vascular Institute

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV