Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - UVMFLOWNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

UVMFLOWNET Archives

September 1999

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
UVMFLOWNET Home UVMFLOWNET Home
UVMFLOWNET September 1999

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Carotid stenosis.
From:
Shelly Burns <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Sep 1999 23:01:07 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
T. Cunningham,
Interesting that you angle at 50 degrees.  Jean may get ruffled over that.
60 degrees has been out there forever.  I give you credit for looking beyond
it though.  So much of these comments say velocity, velocity, velocity.  But
we have found in our lab that people i.e. techs and interpreting physicians
become so number oriented they forget to look for plaque that may or may not
be there.  I do perform some diameter measurements at the area of highest
velocity when I want to verify the category I am in - usually 50-70%- or if
there seems to be unusually high velocities with minimal plaque, I want to
show the interpreting doc that there is no hemodynamic stenosis.  SB

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV