Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 14:35:31 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Comments: |
SoVerNet Verification (on garnet.sover.net) patsmith from
arc0a36.burl.sover.net [207.136.201.36] 207.136.201.36 Fri, 17
Dec 1999 14:35:55 -0500 (EST) |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
coupla things, bobbi.
call deb markowitz (she's probably read this on the list serve already)
the attorney in question sounds a wee bit naiive.
number one, his calling the sec'ty of states office doesn't mean squat
(sorry, deb)...
i am assuming you are an elected official, so tell the questionable attorney
not to vote for you.
we are required to check that a survey is indeed on record (after the law
passed in 1997 or so) prior to recording a deed that references said survey.
if the survey isn't the same, i would be questioning it as well.
it isn't your business whether a survey is correct or not, what is your
business is whether you have the correct survey referenced in the deed to be
recorded.
this is unusual behavior and i'm sorry you have to experience it.
happy holidays anyway.
patty, sudbury
|
|
|