LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  December 1999

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE December 1999

Subject:

The International Chemical Devil: Monsanto

From:

"S. E. Anderson" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 9 Dec 1999 00:44:13 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (201 lines)

http://www.corpwatch.org/trac/corner/worldnews

Once again another powerful essay by Dr. Vandana Shiva... Read and pass
on.
CorporationWatch August 1999

Over the past few years, Monsanto, a chemical company, has positioned
itself as an agricultural company through control over seed the first
link
in the food chain. Monsanto now wants to control water, the very basis
of
life.

In 1996, Monsanto bought the biotechnology assets of Agracetus, a
subsidiary of W.R. GRACE, for $150 million and Calagene, a California
based plant biotechnology company for $340 million. In 1997, Monsanto
acquired Holden seeds, the Brazilian seed company Sementes Agrocerus and

Asgrow. In 1998, Monsanto purchased Cargill's seed operations for $1.4
billion. It bought Delta and Pine land for $1.82 billion and Dekalb for
$2.3
billion. It bought Unilever's European wheat breeding business for $525
million. In India Monsanto has bought Mahyco, Maharashtra Hybrid
Company,
E.I.D. Parry and Rallis. Mr.Jack Kennedy of Monsanto has stated "We
propose
to penetrate the Indian Agricultural sector in a big way. MAHYCO is a
good
vehicle." According to Robert Farley of Monsanto "what you are seeing is
not
just a consolidation of seed companies, it is really a consolidation of
the
entire food chain. Since water is an central to food production as seed
is,
and without water life is not possible.

Monsanto is now trying to establish its control over water. During 1999
Monsanto plans to launch a new water business, starting with India and
Mexico since both these countries are facing water shortages.

Monsanto is seeing a new business opportunity in water because of the
emerging water crisis and the funding available to make this vital
resource available to people. As it states in its strategy paper, "first
we
believe that discontinuities (either major policy changes or major
trendline
breaks in resource quality or quantity) are likely, particularly in the
area
of water and we will be well positioned via these business to profit
even
more significantly when these discontinuities occur. Second, we are
exploring the potential of non-conventional financing (NGO's, World
Bank,
USDA etc.) that may lower our investment or provide local country
business
building resources." Thus, the crisis of pollution and depletion of
water
resources is viewed by Monsanto as a business opportunity. For
Monsanto "Sustainable Development" means the conversion of an ecological

crisis into a market of scarce resources. "The business logic of
sustainable
development is that population growth and economic development will
apply
increasing pressure on natural resource markets. These pressures and the

world's desire to prevent the consequences of these pressures if
unabated,
will create vast economic opportunity when we look at the world through
the
lens of sustainability we are in a position to see current and foresee
impending resource market trends and imbalances that create market
needs. We
have further focussed this lens on the resource market of water and
land.

These are the markets that are most relevant to us as a life sciences
company committed to delivering "food, health and hope" to the world,
and
there are markets in which there are predictable sustainability
challenges
and therefore opportunities to create business value." Monsanto plans to

earn revenues of $420 million and net income of $63 million by 2008 from
its
water business in India and Mexico. By the year 2010 about 2.5 billion
people in the world are projected to lack access to safe drinking water.
At
least 30% of the population in China, India, Mexico and US is expected
to
face severe water stress.

By the year 2025 the supply of water in India will be 700 cubic
kilometers
per year while the demand is expected to rise to 1050 units. Control
over
this scarce and vital resource will of course
be a source of guaranteed profits. As John Bastin of the European Bank
of
Reconstruction and Development has stated "Water is the last
infrastructure frontier for Private investors." Monsanto estimates that
providing safe water is a several billion dollar market. It is growing
at 25
- 30% in rural communities and is estimated to be $300 million by the
year
2000 in India and Mexico. This is the amount currently spent by NGO's
for
water development projects and local government water supply schemes and

Monsanto hopes to tap these public finances for providing water to rural

communities and convert water supply into market. The Indian Government
spent over $ 1.2 billion between 1992-97 for various water projects
whicle
the World Bank spent $900 million. Monsanto would like to divert this
public
money from public supply of water to establishing Monsanto's water
monopoly.
Since in rural areas the poor cannot pay, in Monsanto's view "Capturing
a
piece of the value created for this segment will require the creation of
a
non-traditional mechanism targeted at
building relationships with local government and NGO's as well as
through
innovative financing mechanisms, such as microcredit.

Monsanto also plans to penetrate the Indian market for safe water by
establishing a joint venture with Eureka Forbes / TATA, which controls
70%
of the UV Technologies. To enter the water business Monsanto has
acquired an
equity stake in Water Health International (WHI) with an option to buy
the
rest of the business. Monsanto will also buy a Japanese company which
has
developed electrolysis technology. The joint venture with TATA / Eureka
Forbes is supposed to provide market access, and fabricate, distribute,
service water systems, Monsanto will leverage their brand equity in the
Indian Market. The joint venture route has been chosen so that "Monsanto

can achieve management control over local operations but not have legal
consequences due to local issues."

Another new business that Monsanto is starting in 1999 in Asia in
aquaculture. The aquaculture business will build on the foundation of
Monsanto's agricultural biotechnology and capabilities for fish feed and

fish breeding. By 2008 Monsanto expects to earn revenues of $1.6 billion
and
net income of $266 million from its aquaculture business. While
Monsanto's
entry into aquaculture is through its Sustainable Development activity,
industrial aquaculture has been established to be highly non
sustainable.
The Supreme Court of India had banned industrial shrimp farming because
of
it's catastrophic consequences.

However, the government, under pressure of the aquaculture industry, is
attempting to change the laws, to undo the Supreme Court order. At the
same
time, attempts are being made by the World Bank to privatise water
resources
and establish trade in water rights. These trends will suit Monsanto
well in
establishing its new Water Business and Aquaculture business. The World
Bank
has already offered to help. As the Monsanto strategy paper states "We
are
particularly enthusiastic about the potential of partnering with the
International Finance Corporation (IFC) of the World Bank to joint
venture
projects in developing markets. The IFC is eager to work with Monsanto
to
commercialise sustainability opportunities and would bring both
investment
capital and on the ground capabilities to our efforts."

Monsanto's Water and Aquaculture Business, like it's seed business, is
aimed at controlling vital resources necessary for survival, converting
them
into a market and using public finances to underwrite the investments. A

more efficient conversion of public goods into private profit would be
difficult to find. Water is however too basic for life and survival. The

right to water is the right to life. The privatisation and
commodification
of water is a threat to the right to life. India has had major water
movements to conserve and share water. The Pani Panchayat and the water
conservation movement in Maharashtra and Tarun Bharat Sangh in Alwar,
have
regenerated and equitably shared water as a commons. This is the only
way
that everyone will have the right to water and nobody will have the
right to
abuse and overuse water. Water is a commons and must be managed as a
commons. It cannot be controlled and sold by a Life Sciences
Corporation that peddles in Death.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager