Dear Gerry and others,

I'd like to make a comment on the press fit connectors. Gerry is right that there have not been any problems with the press fit connectors in the past but since about a year we have them quite regularly. It seems that the suppliers of GC columns have changed the coating on the outside of the columns which is not suitable to give the good old tight connections. We now either apply an additional coating (polyimide resin) you could buy from different suppliers on the outside of the column or use special connectors (e.g. Vu2 union connectors) which holds the capillary columns in place.

Regards, Carsten

At 20:46 07.07.2005 -0400, you wrote:
hI Simon--

Do you have a leak opening up at high temp?  Just wondering, you didn't
mention looking at Ar while ramping the GC, or using Ar to check for
leaks.  Also doing small CO2 injections (or Ar) at low and high temp can
help you find the problem.

Do you have enough He pressure to maintain flow rates?  We need ~80 psi
from the tank to maintain 2 mL/min flow rates at 320.  Occassionally the
regulator gets bumped when working on other tanks, and if it's not
brought back up to pressure, flow rates drop at high temp and peaks come
out late.

Back flush valve problems (one inside oven)?  I'm assuming the setup is
similiar to our GCC III.  We had one problem with a leak through the
valve stem (teflon seal) that was hard to trace, but I believe that was
an across the board leak.  Also check the bleed out line to make sure He
is actually bleeding out.  The connections can loosen over time.

Press fit connectors?  I used them in the past, and they've been
great--until recently.  Make sure they haven't opened up on you
(methanol on the outside or Ar leak check).

good luck

gerry

www.geology.yale.edu/escsis/ESCSIS-web1.html



Simon Eaton wrote:

We are experiencing great problems with a high-eluting (320
degrees C) compound by GC-IRMS in hydrogen mode. Analysis by
GCMS is fine, and the same derivative (propyl-chloroformate /
methanol) works fine on GC-IRMS for lower temperature eluting
amino acids. We get almost nothing on exactly the same sample for
which we get a very good response in GCMS.

I presume the problem is one of activity somewhere in the system
(Delta XP with Agilent 6890 and high-temperature conversion
interface). We are using Restek Siltek liners (which work well on
GC-MS) so I expect the problem is either (i) the metal cross piece
between the column and the interface or (ii) the junction betweeen
the fused silica and the ceramic reactor tube. We have tried BGB
analytik deactivated press fit connectors instead of the metal T-piece
(Valco cross piece) but this does not improve matters. We are
currently conditioning the ceramic reactor via a methane back flush,
and the union with the fused silica is made exactly as recommended
by Thermo (i.e. burning off 5mm of the polyimide coating).

Any ideas?

Simon

--
Simon Eaton,
Senior Lecturer in Paediatric Surgery and Metabolic Biochemistry
Unit of Paediatric Surgery
Institute of Child Health
30 Guilford Street
London WC1N 1EH
Phone + 44 (0)20 7905 2158 (Office, Answer)
     + 44 (0)20 7905 2396 (Laboratory)
Fax   + 44 (0)20 7404 6181
Mobile + 44 (0) 7762 180877



°°°
Carsten J. Schubert
Eawag, Surf
Seestrasse 79
CH-6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland
Phone: +41-41-349 21 95
Phone lab: +41-41-349-2122, 29
Fax: +41-41-349 21 68
Phone Secretary: +41-41-349-21 11
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

http://www.eawag.ch/research_e/surf/Researchgroups/biogeochemistry/p_biogeochemistry.htm

http://www.eawag.ch/