Dear Colleagues, Sorry for re-sending the email of David L. Dettman on "the NBS-20 Story? ". My openion for Dr. David L. Dettman for his quarry: The abundance of carbon isotopes in nature is 12:13:14 :: 98.89:1.11:1.2*10^-10. So, there could be some contamination of sample with atmospheric CO2 for C-14 measurements, if the samples are left in contact with atmosphere for sometime. Beacuse you are measuring in the order of 10^-12. But there may not be any appreciable variation in isotopic composition (C-13) of NBS-20 standard due atmospheric CO2. As you have seen in your own measurements. I cannot comments much on the alteration of C-13 of atmospheric dust particles due to atmospheric CO2+H2O. Theoretically, there is a possibility of formation of carbonate (or dust particles) with the evaporation of rain droplets in the atmosphere. Mahendra P. Verma David L. Dettman escribis: > One of our students is working on the stable isotope ratios of carbonate > dust blowing around Tucson. One of the issues involved is alteration of the > original composition through interaction of this very fine carbonate powder > with atmospheric water vapor and CO2. It is well known in the 14C community > that fine grain carbonate powder will pick up modern CO2 and give anomalous > ages. This got me to thinking about the old standard NBS-20 and whether > interaction with atmosphere can result in measurable shifts in either d13C > or d18O. Can anyone describe the problems that led to the abandonment of > NBS-20? Did the increased variability (or trend in composition) show up in > oxygen or in carbon or both? > Throughout the 1980s we used NBS-20 at the Univ. of Michigan. The > original supply was split into small amounts and each was sealed and stored > in a desiccator. We never saw any drift in its measured composition. > Many thanks, > David Dettman > > David Dettman [log in to unmask] > Dept. of Geosciences ph. (520) 621-4618 > Univ. of Arizona FAX (520) 621-2672 > Gould-Simpson Bldg. > Tucson, AZ 85721