Print

Print


Bill and I would be willing to host a discussion group at our home in
Pomfret on Friday, December 15th at 7 p.m.  We can be flexible on the time
if needed.  We will even provide dessert and coffee.   John, maybe you could
just confirm this at some point  We can make some phone calls to producers
in the area.

Looking forward to it.
Cathy



----- Original Message -----
From: John Winder <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: discussion


> I need to formalize plans to hold face-to-face discussion groups.  If Bill
> and Cathy would be willing to host a session, I propose that we get
> something on the calendar.  I can meet as early as mid-December (14, 15,
> 18, 20) or we can schedule something in January (4,5,15, 23, 24, 25, or
26).
>
> Ed Jackson also suggested St. Johnsbury.  What about other potential
> sites.  I would like to have at least 3 meetings this winter.
>
> John
>
> At 08:51 PM 11/14/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >John,
> >
> >We were just wondering if any concrete plans were being made for these
> >"live" discussion groups.  We know several people in our area who would
> >probably be interested in coming but they don't have computers and
> >therefore, don't know about these plans.  We would be happy to round up a
> >group of producers in our area if you want to get this started.
> >
> >Bill & Cathy
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Keith Cutting <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:33 PM
> >Subject: Re: discussion
> >
> >
> > > John Winder wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would like to schedule some discussion groups around the state to
> >begin a
> > > > dialog about the most critical needs of producers in the state.  I
would
> > > > appreciate input on potential dates and locations.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > >
> > >
> > > I would be interested in attending a group discussion in the White
River
> > > Area, Bill and Cathy's place would be fine.  Evenings or weekends are
> > > best for me.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Keith