Print

Print


definitely depends on the definition of the word "connected"

granted, the whole thing was vague, and I slightly overreacted (but only
slightly) to the thought of a connection between SBush and MRG.   Is it too
late to put a Single in at Sugarbush?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Chrusch" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [SKIVT-L] Sugarbush Sale News


> Walt says:
> >3. "those connected to the nearby Mad River Glen Co-op are part of the
group
> >trying to buy Sugarbush"  (!!!) I would like to know more on this...not
> >something this coop shareholder would favor.
>
> Why? The report didn't say that the *co-op itself* was part of the group
> trying to buy Sbush. In fact the phrase (in full context) "Sources tell
us,
> those connected to the nearby Mad River Glen Co-op are part of the group
> trying to buy Sugarbush" is really pretty meaningless. It can mean some
> share holders, maybe a couple of board members, or almost anything else.
No
> need to get our shorts in a knot over innuendo based on second hand rumor.
>
> -Marc
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.
>
> To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html