By Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
Street murders occur every day in America. And they are prosecuted
day in America.
Corporate homicides occur every day in America. But they are rarely
The last homicide prosecution brought against a major American
corporation was in 1980, when a Republican prosecutor charged Ford
Co. with homicide for the deaths of three teenaged girls who died
their Ford Pinto caught on fire after being rear-ended in northern
Indiana. The prosecutor alleged that Ford knew that it was marketing
defective product, with a gas tank that crushed when rear ended,
spilling fuel, which caught on fire and incinerated the three
girls. But Ford brought in a hot shot criminal defense lawyer who
secured a not guilty verdict after getting the judge to keep key
evidence out of the jury room.
Now comes Ira Robbins, a professor of criminal law at American
Robbins argues that the time is ripe to bring a homicide
against the tobacco companies and their executives.
"Government should not ignore the criminal aspects of what the
companies were doing," Robbins told us last week. "In fact,
argument can be made that, over time, tobacco company executives
consciously disregarded the substantial and unjustifiable risk
people might be killed."
"If this could be proven, then it would come under the
definition of involuntary manslaughter," Robbins said. "So,
conclusion is that it is not outside the realm of possibility that
tobacco executives ought to be indicted for homicide crimes."
To gain a second degree murder conviction, a prosecutor must show
conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that
would occur under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to
value of human life."
A 1,400 page summary of evidence against the tobacco companies filed
the Justice Department's civil racketeering case against the
companies indicates that maybe the evidence does indeed exist for
second degree murder charge. The Justice Department is seeking to
recover $289 billion from the tobacco companies.
We wanted to get a copy of the seven-volume filing, but the
Department wouldn't let us copy it, or give us a copy on a CD --
they obviously have.
Instead, the Department said we could come over and "look at it
not copy any part of it." So we did.
The documents show how the major tobacco companies for decades
to deceive the public about the harm caused by tobacco products,
to discredit scientific studies linking smoking and disease,
their products to make them more addictive, and marketed tobacco
products to children.
The Department alleges that the tobacco companies in 1953 launched
decades-long "fraudulent scheme" to deceive the public about
of smoking and discredit scientific and medical evidence that
was a cause of disease.
The companies "designed their cigarettes with a central
objective -- to ensure that the smoker could obtain enough nicotine
create and sustain addiction."
They deceptively marketed "light" and "low-tar"
cigarettes as less
hazardous despite knowing from their own research that this was not
case, the Department charges.
They also manipulated the design of these cigarettes so that they
produced less tar when tested by government smoking machines, but
when smoked by actual smokers who changed their smoking habits to
maintain nicotine levels, according to the Department.
The Department charged that the companies "continue to advertise
youth-oriented publications, employ imagery and messages that they
are appealing to teenagers, increasingly concentrate their marketing
places where they know youths will frequent such as convenience
engage in strategic pricing to attract youths, increase their
at point-of-sale locations with promotions, self-service displays,
other materials, sponsor sporting and entertainment events, many
which are televised or otherwise broadcast and draw large youth
audiences, and engage in a host of other activities which are
to attract youths to begin and continue smoking."
It seems clear to us that multi-million dollar fines aren't getting
message across to corporate America. The criminal law would deter
educate corporate America like no civil lawsuit could.
As Professor Robbins put it: "Undoubtedly corporate officials
rather pay money than go to prison."
Professor Robbins has a theory.
The Justice Department has the evidence on a CD.
We suggest that some prosecutor somewhere get a copy of the CD and
Professor Robbins a call.
It might change the way corporate America does business.
Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate
Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
Multinational Monitor, http://www.multinationalmonitor.org. They
co-authors of Corporate Predators: The Hunt for MegaProfits and
Attack on Democracy (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press;
(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
This article is posted at:
Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell
and Robert Weissman. Please feel free to forward the column to friends
repost the column on other lists. If you would like to post the column
a web site or publish it in print format, we ask that you first
([log in to unmask]
or [log in to unmask]
Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the
[log in to unmask]
To subscribe, unsubscribe or change
your address to corp-focus, go to:
<http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/corp-focus> or send
message to [log in to unmask]
with your request.
Focus on the Corporation columns are posted at
Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like
comment on the columns, send a message to [log in to unmask]