New Anti-Environment Tack By
April 20, 2003
New Anti-Environment Tack By Bush?
The Bush administration is quietly reshaping environmental policy
to expand logging and other development by settling a series of
lawsuits, many of them filed by industry groups.
As a result of settlements, the administration has announced plans to
remove wilderness protections from millions of acres of land in Utah.
It also agreed to review protections for endangered species such as
salmon and the northern spotted owl, reversed a Clinton-era ban on
snowmobiles in Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks and softened
rules on logging.
None of the decisions were subject to prior public comment or
"I don't know if it's a policy, but it's definitely a pattern,"
said Kristen Boyles, a lawyer for the environmental group
Earthjustice, who has frequently battled the Bush administration in
"The industry sues and then the current administration does
a poor job of defending itself or comes to a sweetheart settlement,"
Critics call it "sue and settle," leaving few
fingerprints as officials move to roll back environmental
CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen points out that, "This
collusion claim is very hard to prove because it requires getting into
the minds of the lawyers and officials involved. But federal judges in
particular absolutely have to be more diligent about scrutinizing
these settlements before accepting them. Once they are accepted they
are virtually impossible to get around.
"IF this is happening-- and right now that is a big if-- it's
illegal and unethical and you would think that both the legislative
branch and the judicial branch would want to do something to stop it.
Congress could clarify environmental laws and policies and judges
could look much more closely about whether these settlements are
reasonable or motivated by political gain.
"It's difficult, it might even be impossible, to separate out the
politics involved in these lawsuits and settlements from the LAWS
involved in them. It would just about take a smoking-gun sort of memo
from an Administration official to a litigant to prove collusion and I
cannot imagine that such a memo exists," Cohen continues.
Last month, several environmental groups filed a federal lawsuit
claiming the administration and the timber industry have been holding
secret talks to undermine the Northwest Forest Plan. The suit seeks
access to settlement documents under the Freedom of Information
Mark Rey, the Agriculture undersecretary who directs forest policy,
denies any attempt to orchestrate legal challenges.
"No litigation is friendly," he said.
But critics suggest the administration is using the lawsuit
settlements as an end-run around Congress, which has blocked some
parts of the Bush agenda, including efforts to open Alaska's Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling and the Healthy Forests
Initiative, which would increase logging in national forests to reduce
the risk of wildfires.
"In the guise of settling lawsuits, federal officials have
retired to the back room to work out deals that sacrifice our
old-growth forests, salmon and clean water for the sake of
clearcutting our public lands," said Patti Goldman of
Earthjustice, one of the plaintiffs in the freedom of information
In recent weeks, the administration has settled several industry
challenges to the Northwest Forest Plan, which governs logging and
habitat protection for salmon and other threatened species. Among
other actions, the government agreed to review Endangered Species Act
protections for the northern spotted owl and marbled murrelet, birds
that are icons of the Northwest timber wars. In a separate action,
officials have proposed weakening some salmon protections to boost
The National Park Service also has allowed snowmobiles in Yellowstone
and Grand Teton national parks, and the Agriculture Department
declined to defend the "roadless" rule, a Clinton-era policy
that blocks road-building in remote forest areas.
Last week, the Interior Department announced that in response to a
lawsuit it intends to halt all reviews of its Western land holdings
for new wilderness protection and to withdraw that protected status
from some 3 million acres in Utah. That settlement was approved by a
federal judge on Monday, three days after it was filed.
Rey, a former timber industry lobbyist, said officials are doing
nothing the Clinton administration didn't do in the 1990s.
"I understand why they're unhappy," Rey said of critics,
"but their unhappiness needs to be measured in balance to the
situation they enjoyed when people who agreed with them more often
than not were in this position."
Rey said the Clinton administration encouraged friendly suits from
environmentalists to block logging in Northwest forests, prevent
road-building and stop development on vast wilderness areas controlled
by the Bureau of Land Management.
Environmentalists deny that claim.
"I do not know of any instance where the Clinton administration
said, 'You sue us, and we'll settle and we'll stop a timber sale.' It
hasn't happened in this office," said Boyles of Earthjustice.
Each of the settlements the Bush administration agrees to is presented
to a judge and will be subject to public comment. Rey said they will
be judged on their merits.
"Nobody gets frozen out of our actions because the public
ultimately is going to get a chance to comment. If they are
dissatisfied, they will get their own opportunity to sue," Rey
But environmental groups call the comment period a formality, which
rarely produces any substantive change in the settlement.
Chris West of the American Forest Resource Council, a Portland,
Ore.-based timber group which has filed several of the lawsuits,
denied any collusion in the litigation.
He said Mr. Bush is "just trying to put some balance into
how these forests are managed," noting that logging in the
Northwest has dropped in the past decade to less than a third of the
volume recommended by the Northwest Forest Plan.