Print

Print


        By the time I had been on email for only 15 months, I had noticed many
examples of the drastic rudeness which is readily resorted to by some on email,
especially if they think they will never meet the person they're abusing.
        Here's some good neoFreudian analysis of this problem (by a prof of
English):
http://www.human-nature.com/free-associations/holland.html


        I urge you to read the excellent Howard S (as distinct
from Howard K) Schwartz.  Here's a sampler from his website
http://www.sba.oakland.edu/faculty/schwartz/schwartz.htm


     Deconstructing My Car at the Detroit Airport
                                     by
                             Howard S. Schwartz
        Organization Studies 14 (2), 1993, 279-281 (slightly revised)

Returning to Detroit from an academic conference, my head was still buzzing
with what I had learned from the feminists.  All of them were doing work in
feminist deconstruction, and joyfully working out its implications.
Following their lead, I came to see that the organized world is a text that
expresses male domination.  Furthermore, I understood that the male principle
is domination.  If that text could be deconstructed, domination itself could
be overcome and the female principle -- warm, nurturant, and life-giving --
would be able to emerge.

The shuttle bus took me to long-term parking and I found my little car,
waiting for me where I had left it.  Without even thinking, I opened the door
and began to get in.  And that was when the thought hit me.

Getting into the car ... why obviously the car was a female and, expressing
a masculinity which I now understood to permeate me to my core, I was about to
about to enter her and use her for my own purposes in just the same way that
men have used women for thousands of years.

I stepped back from her, astonished by the power of my insight.  For I saw
that there was a larger dimension involved than my simply entering this car
at this time.  Indeed, it became clear enough to me in this moment, the whole
pattern of male domination over the female was present here. And this was so
perhaps least of all with regard to my entering the car and forcing her to
do my will.  More important, I came to realize, was the fact that the car
itself, while clearly female, had been interpenetrated by male desires; her
beautiful feminine essence warped and degraded by the domination of the
phallus.

At that point I decided that I had to deconstruct the car; not for her sake
alone, nor even for the sake of all the females of which she was a part, but
for myself and all males as well.  Crippled and driven by our own phallic
assumptions, we had been deprived of the beauty that could exist if the
female principle were allowed its sway.  In a small way, I saw, I could start
here.  I could remove the influence of male domination from this beautiful
car and leave her to express her female essence in a way that she, and only
she, would determine.

I began with the item that first struck my attention: the driveshaft.
Driveshaft, get it?  This was obviously a penis.  In the trunk was a hacksaw.
I took it out and began to cut through.  It was hard work, and it was hot,
but as I gave up my doubts and hesitancies, it was as if I had discovered a
new source of energy, for the work appeared to become lighter.  And, indeed,
as the hacksaw bit through the last of the metal, and as the driveshaft fell
away from the car, I too felt lightened, relieved of a weighty burden that I
had carried all my life.  Now, it was plain to me, I had passed the point of
no-return. I was committed by my own actions.  I could not turn back.

Next I turned to a more subtle instance of the domination of male values --
the steering system.  Think of it.  You turn the steering wheel a certain
amount and the car turns by a similar amount.  So rational, so logocentric,
so cold, so quintessentially male.  This would never do.  With my hacksaw I
cut out a length of the steering column and, in its place, I inserted an old
inner tube that I had been carrying around.  Fastened to both ends of the gap
in the column, the inner tube would act like a large rubber band.  Now, turn
the steering wheel and perhaps something will happen. And perhaps it won't.
So full of freedom!  So intuitive!  So warm!  So feminine!  Irigaray herself
could not have done better.

Next my attention fastened upon the wheels.  The wheels, with their fullness
and roundness, seemed to me at first to be contrary to my overall judgment.
Could they be a feminine element in the car?  But then my thought led me to
recognize the subtle sexism inherent in their use.  For each of these wheels
was penetrated and subservient to an axle, whose bidding they were forced to
do.  Moreover, it was the wheels that were burdened with the punishment of
the road.  The axles needed to do nothing but turn.  Master and slave.  Here it
was again.  Moreover, as I thought about the matter, an even deeper level of
offense made itself known to me.  Each axle penetrated and dominated two
wheels.  Not only were the poor wheels raped and dominated, they were
devalued as well.  This could clearly not be allowed to pass.

I removed the wheels from the axles and placed them in the front seat.
Henceforth, they would ride in the position of honor that they deserved.  The
axles, now in contact with the road surface, would have to endure the
suffering which formerly they had imposed on gentler others.  Let justice be
done.  They deserved no pity.

Finally, I came to the part of the car that seemed most obviously male.  It
was the engine.  Gas drinker, fume maker, taking from Mother Nature and
giving back junk.  This was what it meant to be male expressed in its
essence.  And for what were these lovely hydrocarbons consumed?  Speed, power,
the lust of going ever faster.  Competition, domination  ... The male image was
unavoidable.  Certainly no woman has ever been interested in stuff like that.

But as I thought about the engine the thought occurred to me that this image
of the engine serving the purpose of domination had, literally, only
scratched the surface.  For when I began to think of what was going on within
the engine, my horror and my shame came unbound.  For there, within the
engine, where outsiders could not see, the most terrible scenes of male
brutality occurred.  The engine, I came to realize, ran on rape.  The pistons
penetrated the cylinder heads and they did this each time the crankshaft
turned.  This was not only rape, it was gang rape and it happened with
unbelievable speed and under the most appalling circumstances.  Two thousand,
three thousand, four thousand ... up to six thousand Rapes Per Minute!  And
the heat, the pressure, the sheer unrestrained violence!  Tears in my eyes, I
ripped the cylinder head from the engine and placed the poor battered dear
in the rear seat.  Never again would this be allowed to happen.  Never.

But my new consciousness understood that simply rescuing the cylinder head
would not suffice.  Payment would have to be exacted for the crime.  Moreover,
punishing the pistons would not be sufficient.  The entire infrastructure of
male domination that supported, encouraged, and even demanded this outrage
would have to suffer as well.

The sun was beginning to set as I took my hacksaw to the pistons, and I knew
that my work had just begun.  After the pistons, the connecting rods would
have to go, then the bearings, the flywheel, the crankshaft, the engine
casings... they would all have to pay.

It was mid-morning when I cut up the last piece of the engine.  My heart
relieved of its guilt, I put a plant where it had been.  Mother Nature and
the car could now be one.

But I was tired.  The night had been long and hard.  I wished I could get into
the beautiful car, now restored to her pristine state, and drive her home.
But I knew that this was not to be.  I would impose my male will on her no
longer.  She was free to go her own feminine way.  I began the long walk home,
wondering where her path would lead her.

- - -

        I think you'll admit this illustrates the power of humour in
political argumentation.
Indeed, it seems to me that little else is likely to work against WimminsLib.
After all, it generally makes good sense to use a weapon your opponent
lacks and cannot understand.