I took a detour on my way home last night to try out my new Rossi BC X8
boots with a pair brand new 170cm Atomic Rainier & not-so new 169cm
Fischer Rebounds.

To be sure, the X8 is way to the left on the touring<===>turns spectrum.
But despite it's power limitations, on skinny enough skis it's possible
to have fun in tele mode with them, and in parallel mode survival-skiing
headwalls is possible. But it is way sub-ideal as a touring-for-turns
boot, even with the relative turny Rebound/Rainier type skis.  It's easy
toe & ankle flex make seems like it would make a great kick'n'glide boot
though, possibly even better than the SNS-BC/Raid boots which are
slightly stiffer flexing at the toe and are relying on the free hinging
of the toe bar for freeing up kick'n'glide.   The durometer of the
bumper on the SNS-BC bindings + toe flex of the boot seems like a
heavier load than the BC- X8 in a Voile 3-pin, but I've yet to test them
side by side.

But back to the skis:  The Rainier & Atomics are REMARKABLY similar by
almost any measure- more like twin sisters than close-cousins.  That
said, there are discernable differences.  In climb mode they both rather
suck- they start giving up at about the same low ~10-12 degree angle.

But in kick'n'glide mode the stiffer,  higher-camber Rebound is
perceptibly smoother with possibly better glide.(It was hard to tell for
sure, since the surface was dirty & rough, and not flat enough in
distances to get a good rhythm going. Maybe I'll try it with one
Rainier, one Rebound this evening.)

Pointing them down, both make nice round turns as one would expect of a
shaped XC ski.  The Atomics seemed a bit smoother overall, but the
Rebounds are more positive in the turn initiation and perceptibly
grippier through the turn. The difference wasn't huge- not even the
difference between Premium Vanilla and French  Vanilla  ice cream, but
it was there, probably attributable to the differences in camber & flex.

Of the two, on the dirty firm old snow w/ bits of smoother corn
conditions I slightly preferred the Rebound, but that might be different
were I comparing the longer 179cm Rebound against the 180cm Rainier.  I
suspect in softer stuff the Rainier would ski sweeter too, at any lenth,
but I may have to wait until November/December to test that thesis.

Other factors that may affect the comparison: The Rebounds are mounted
pins on balance point, the Rainiers mounted pins 1.5cm ahead of balance
point. (Curiously, balance point was less than 1mm away from chord
center on the Rainier- perhaps by design?)  Also the Rainiers are
mounted with Voile 201 lightest-duty telemark 3-pins, whereas the
Rebounds have the heavier-duty 3-pin + cable binding (but I have yet to
ski 'em with the cables. It might be curious to see if the cable helps
out the X8 boot enough to make a difference, but that's another test).

I haven't weighed 'em yet, but hefted in the hand I can't say with any
confidence which setup is lighter- they're probably within 100 grams of
each other, are very light with a great performance per gram ratio.


_____________ ________ __

__ /________ ________ ___

__( Tele till you drop!

___\ ________ ________ __

____) ______ __________ _

___/ ______ ___________ _

__( o ____ __________ __

__ \(|\.____ _______ ____

___`\>/______ ____ ______

____ \` ______ __ _______

______`________ _ _______

_______________ __ ______

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit