As with the previous "case study" here's another example of a full- 
text article that is missing its most crucial content which happens  
to be contained
in a figure not included in the online version from ProQuest, the  
only online database we subscribe to that has this supplement:

  Willett WC, Sacks F, Trichopoulou A, Drescher G, Ferro-Luzzi A,  
Helsing E, Trichopoulos D.
Mediterranean diet pyramid: a cultural model for healthy eating.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1995 Jun;61(6 Suppl):1402S-1406S. Review.
PMID: 7754995 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
"It [the diet pyramid that is the focus of the article] is presented in
Figure 2.(Figure 2 omitted)"


> From: "Bulger, James R" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: January 3, 2006 3:18:29 PM GMT-05:00
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Case study: the future of full-text access
> Reply-To: "Bulger, James R" <[log in to unmask]>
> Not one to beat a dead horse, I'd like to raise this issue again,  
> which Theresa Arndt so adroitly brought to our attention back in  
> October.  Has
> anyone done a study of this issue?  How widespread is it?  What  
> percentage of online journals fail to provide access to complete  
> content?
> Failing that, I'd settle for other anecdotal evidence beyond the  
> AFP title.
> Happy new year, one and all!
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Jim Bulger, MLIS
> Library Services - 14001
> Allina Hospitals & Clinics
> 800 East 28th Street                             voice (612) 863-5230
> Minneapolis, MN  55407-3799                   fax (612) 863-5695
> [log in to unmask]
> ------------------------------------------------------------

> ********************************************************************** 
> ***
> -----------------------------
> Dear colleagues,
> I recently attempted to locate the full-text of an article from a  
> journal to which our library subscribes.  It turned out that  
> versions of the electronic journal from multiple vendors had  
> significant portions expurgated due to copyright issues.  I see  
> this as a cautionary tale for consideration as we move to cancel  
> print in favor of electronic only. It is not safe to assume that  
> the online version includes all print content.

> I express these concerns because I think we need to look more  
> carefully into the actual content of our online journals when  
> making decisions regarding cutting print subscriptions.  The  
> implications become even broader when you consider the future of  
> Interlibrary Loan from
> collections which have cancelled print in favor of electronic only  
> access.  Assuming our license for an electronic version allowed  
> ILL, we still would not be able to supply this article.
> Imagine you are the patron.  According to our library's catalog we  
> have at least five (5) subscriptions that include this article  
> (including 1 print; I'm counting multiple Gale aggregations as one  
> subscription) and yet I could not get the full-text of this  
> article.  And even more bizarre, each vendor
> expurgates different content!  From the point of view of the  
> library, we are paying for subscriptions to this publication from  
> multiple sources and still not getting full-text.
> If you care for gory details, here they are:
> The article used for example:
> Rao SS. Prevention of falls in older patients.
> Am Fam Physician. 2005 Jul 1;72(1):81-8. Review.
> PMID: 16035686 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
>          Should have one image, 3 tables, 1 figure
> AAFP (the publisher) open access PDF:
>          includes the image plus only tables 1 and 3; for others  
> notes:
>          "The rightsholder did not grant rights to reproduce this  
> item in
> electronic media. For the missing item, see the original print  
> version of
> this publication."
> Print copy -- issue was never received; catalog notes a claim was
> submitted.
> ProQuest:
>          includes only table 2: for others notes: "Image and/or text
> ommitted per publisher"
> OCLC FirstSearch (Wilson):
>          includes tables 1 and 2 only; for table 3 says "table  
> omitted";
> gives title of figure 1 with no other note regarding its absence;   
> also,
> the text is html only and the two tables provided have apparently been
> keyed in with at least one typo error (leading me to question its
> accuracy), and the poor formatting makes the tables very difficult to
> read
> MD Consult:
>          includes only table 2; for others notes:   "The rights holder
> did
> not grant the American Academy of Physicians the right to sublicense
> this
> material to a third party.  For the missing item, see the original  
> print
> version of this publication."
> Gale:
>          Health Reference Center Academic
>          includes only table 2, which is difficult to read having been
> rekeyed as plain text; gives no notices in the html text body that  
> other
> content is missing, but does note at the end that "reprints are not
> available from the author"!
>          (Gale Health & Wellness subscription gives you no text
> whatsoever,
> but a note that says "Content not available due to copyright
> restrictions.")
> **************************
> Theresa Arndt, MLS
> Taubman Medical Library, University of Michigan
> 1135 East Catherine St 0726, Ann Arbor, MI  48109-2038
> voice: 734-936-1397    fax:   734-763-1473
> email: [log in to unmask]
> and
> -----------------------------
> Anna Ercoli Schnitzer
> Information Services Librarian
> Taubman Medical Library
> University of Michigan
> Ann Arbor MI 48109
> [log in to unmask]